Sylpheed in linux does what you want. It needs X and gtk. It handled threading fine
but I get this list in digest form now because I think it's easier. Anyway, there's
also a version called sylpheed-claws which is "unstable" but it works just fine, and
livin on the edge is more fun anyway ;-)
I maybe need to add that i always run pingbooster 3... if that has
something todo with the lower cpu usage. could also be some other tweaks..
it was a while since i installed my baby...
/Bjorn
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, kama wrote:
>
> well.. my server got a lower load when enabling hz=1000.. not much
well.. my server got a lower load when enabling hz=1000.. not much but
still lower.. hmm.. perhaps 1-2% lower...
/Bjorn
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Oscar N aka Dreadful wrote:
> lower??? are you sure? our servers used slightly more CPU with
> HZ=1000, not that much but still not lower :)
>
> /Oscar, ww
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Well its impossible that its lower the cpu burning, HZ=1000 does increse the cpu used.
It tells to go for 1 ms vs 10 ms, so more thing to calculate more often = more
cpu.Just think of it, its impo
> -Original Message-
> Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 11:09:42 -0300
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Capriotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HZ=1000 and CPU-usage on FreeBSD 5.0
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It increases CPU usage for me too.
>
> I was using 5.0 but the high C
Hi guys,
I'm not sure if this is possible, but I was wondering how to go about
getting MRTG to monitor my HLDS Servers that I'm running on my machine. I'm
probably going to publish the live stats on our website, would anyone have a
clue?
Please help me setup this from scratch, or would you know a
It increases CPU usage for me too.
I was using 5.0 but the high CPU use for NAT made me give it up, some time
ago.
Maybe now it's better.
Looks like latency is lower under FreeBSD 4.8-stable as well, according to
my customers.
At 07:58 AM 6/8/2003, you wrote:
> lower??? are you sure? our server
lol, christ.
> > Yah and my 486 still makes a great paper weight to, get with the times,
> > not using a mouse doesn't make you cool anymore, just unproductive,
Anyone else care to pull this statement apart?
A 486 or a p75 is a great asset depending on what you want to do with it. If
you just want
Hi!
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 01:00:49AM -0400, Nicholas Hockey wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 23:53, Udo Held wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:59:06PM -0400, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
> > > > www.mutt.org
> > > >
> > > > A text emailclient. It's working fine in my console
> > >
> lower??? are you sure? our servers used slightly more CPU with HZ=1000,
> not that much but still not lower :)
Bjorn is the only one arround here which lowers his CPU usage while
he increases the HZ value...
Quite... Amazing.
--
http://gamez.solexine.fr
>
> Alfred - here is Intel Cel. cpuproc -
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> cpu family : 15
> model : 1
> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.70GHz
> stepping: 3
> cpu MHz : 1699.814
> cache size : 256 KB
> fdiv_bug: no
I'm running a 15-Slot CS Server on my Celeron 1200, 256 MB Ram.
I noticed increased CPU-usage since I run 3.1.1.1, but only around
10-20% more (depends on the map), so this is no real problem for me.
I took a look at the list of running processes, and I'm running
hlds_i686... So it looks like hld
12 matches
Mail list logo
