MS> I'm still waiting for you to sniff a password from my clear-text
MS> POP3 server. You don't have to tell us how and release this
MS> exploit, just prove that it works by doing something useful.
Just to back Britt up a bit: I've just read a documentation about ARP
hacking techniques and I unders
Britt Priddy (PZGN) wrote:
>
> Yeah - like I said - "I have no idea what I'm talking about"
> Whats even more frightening is that I passed the CCIE exam with flying
> colors - but I cheated right? :P
Finally you admitted that.
___
To unsubscribe, edit
IF what you're talking about was even remotely possible, every
website on Earth would have been hacked already, email passwords
would be useless, and in fact considered a security risk, and
anything unencrypted would be sniffed out by every script kiddy
on the net.
-
Tyler "[TASF]Overkill"
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
I cant believe you guys are STILL talking about this...
Hey, this is one of the best and most productive discussions since months :)
SCNR
Frank
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please vis
Yeah - like I said - "I have no idea what I'm talking about"
Whats even more frightening is that I passed the CCIE exam with flying
colors - but I cheated right? :P
LOL - I'm outta this discussion - its only going to lead to more wanna
be hackers on the net.
Enjoy!
I cant believe you guys are STILL talking about this...
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank
->Stollar
->Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:33 PM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Reporting Server Hackers
->
->
->Floria
Florian Zschocke wrote:
"Britt Priddy (PZGN)" wrote:
LOL Florian - that is where I sit. (the spoofed packet):P
LOL Britt - I'm not sure what you are trying to tell me. :) That MAC
address is a Cisco MAC address and I am 95% sure that Frank doesn't have
a NIC with a Cisco MAC address. So I gu
According to the great words of PZGN:
> That's ok - I know it's a Cisco MAC Address - but I have to stop here -
> I'm not going to be the guy that spills out the fire on how things are
> done behind the scenes. We can leave it at, "I have no idea what I'm
> talking about" - or "I'm wrong and a wan
According to the great words of Florian Zschocke:
> Well, then excuse me for being a nitpicker but since this subject is
> infested with too much half-truths and incomplete facts, I thought it
> was worth pointing out that this statement wasn't a bit unprecise. :) No
> offence.
Since we're maximiz
That's ok - I know it's a Cisco MAC Address - but I have to stop here -
I'm not going to be the guy that spills out the fire on how things are
done behind the scenes. We can leave it at, "I have no idea what I'm
talking about" - or "I'm wrong and a wanna be :P" - just for sakes
argument. So - ba
According to the great words of PZGN:
> Ok - to clear the confusion - this is done by spoofing and placing
> yourself on that local segment - and you can obtain any MAC address you
> are able to connect to - note I pulled the MAC of the IP of the guy that
> asked me to look at it - this was done by
"Britt Priddy (PZGN)" wrote:
>
> LOL Florian - that is where I sit. (the spoofed packet):P
LOL Britt - I'm not sure what you are trying to tell me. :) That MAC
address is a Cisco MAC address and I am 95% sure that Frank doesn't have
a NIC with a Cisco MAC address. So I guess I still didn't qui
Frank Stollar wrote:
>
> Sorry for the simple misunderstanding as I only talked about 'ethernet
> ARP' as we are taking about MAC addresses.
Well, then excuse me for being a nitpicker but since this subject is
infested with too much half-truths and incomplete facts, I thought it
was worth pointing
Britt Priddy (PZGN) wrote:
Ok - to clear the confusion - this is done by spoofing and placing
yourself on that local segment - and you can obtain any MAC address you
are able to connect to - note I pulled the MAC of the IP of the guy that
asked me to look at it - this was done by sitting on his n
"Britt Priddy (PZGN)" wrote:
>
> Ok - to clear the confusion - this is done by spoofing and placing
> yourself on that local segment - and you can obtain any MAC address you
> are able to connect to
Right, any MAC address you are able to *connect to*. You are not able to
connect to any MAC address
Florian Zschocke wrote:
Frank Stollar wrote:
Espacially this would be very hard if anywhere between two routers is no
ethernet-link but ATM or any other Layer2 protocol. In no other Layer2
are ARPs present.
Uhm, no. ARP is not restricted to Ethernet.
As ATM hast no MAC adresses, ARP would not wo
Florian Zschocke wrote:
> > Espacially this would be very hard if anywhere between two routers is no
> > ethernet-link but ATM or any other Layer2 protocol. In no other Layer2
> > are ARPs present.
>
> Uhm, no. ARP is not restricted to Ethernet.
But on the other hand some historic PROnet or ARCnet
LOL Florian - that is where I sit. (the spoofed packet):P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Florian
Zschocke
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Reporting Server Hackers
"Britt Prid
Ok - to clear the confusion - this is done by spoofing and placing
yourself on that local segment - and you can obtain any MAC address you
are able to connect to - note I pulled the MAC of the IP of the guy that
asked me to look at it - this was done by sitting on his network with a
spoofed pack
Florian Zschocke wrote:
> Someone is running a cs/tfc server on a Cisco router? Wow, that is a new
> one to me! :)
Well, you can "forward" ports :)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.val
Frank Stollar wrote:
>
> Espacially this would be very hard if anywhere between two routers is no
> ethernet-link but ATM or any other Layer2 protocol. In no other Layer2
> are ARPs present.
Uhm, no. ARP is not restricted to Ethernet.
Florian.
___
To un
"Britt Priddy (PZGN)" wrote:
>
> As for your machine - I see SSH running that's pretty much it as far as
> anything I can connect to to establish an open connection.
> IP 141.84.69.34 = MAC = 00:09:b7:27:84:a0
> Almost 99% UDP traffic is seen - which as you probably know is just raw
> data in clea
Britt Priddy (PZGN) wrote:
> I understand the logic you're thinking and how easy it is to 'sniff'
> traffic even on a network that is not inline - but all you have to do is
> get an arp request from the IP in question - which then gives you the
Which you cannot get, unless you are on the same Ethe
23 matches
Mail list logo
