Naw, no ping boost plugins, just -pingboost 2 and a high HZ kernel (2.6)
Here is mine:
Its a Dual AMD 2600+ using Red Hat and the 2.6 test
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
13.00 33.18 46.27 102 400 956.02 12
Ive been really happy with the 2.6 kernel :)
21:51:01 up
Are you doing this from console or from rcon ?
what are you doing to get 900+ FPS? Using some plugin? That will for sure
throw your real stats off.
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Fernicola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:31 PM
Subject:
hehehe they monitor this list - they just dont sink down to the level the
majority of the posters are favoring.
- Original Message -
From: "Drew Broadley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:31 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Someone maybe crashing
post this servers IP - lets fill it up and see what it can really do instead
of all the talk.
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Fernicola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] 5 reasons i'm shutting down my HL Serve
I'd be happy to try if I only had access to an amd64 box.
-Original Message-
From: hondaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Opyteron and Metamod...
He said that he didn't have time to support all the diff
Everyone take note of your L2 Cache on your CPU - I'm willing to bet 90% of
the people with 512k L2 cache do not have these problems - anything below
this - yes - you'll see choke / gag / puke... I've tested it on 128k / 256k
and 512k... 256k is reasonable - but still not 100% vs a CPU with 512k
He said that he didn't have time to support all the different platforms, the
code was open source, so someone else should be able to do it.
Unfortunatley, I cant. I tried. :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin J.
Anderson
Sent: Tuesday,
The game is old, so old I'm surprised they are still supporting it.
If I where answering I would say no. They have their work cut-out creating the
next big thing. They cant afford to spend all their time patching old code.
Either run the servers and put up with the high resource requirements
or d
Will wrote:
I think most people don't setup the servers properly, and thats the main
problem. You have to remember that valve have setup a 5year old engine to
work with our modern day machines, which in its own right is pretty
impressive. I have no issues with steam at this time, fair enough it is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
27523 is the original, 27526 is duplicate #1, and 27527 is duplicate #2.
Any ideas?
if you can access its consoles, see if they are really running -- ie,
not returning "port already in use". Maybe your start script are loosing
in some place.
--
dual_bereta_r0x -- Alexandre
Will wrote:
but why complain, its how it is.
So valve will tell you: HL2 will need AS A START a Opteron FX 3.2+ to
run ONE 20-slot server. You will blindly buy 3 of them JUST to run it?!
I don't care about technology needs, but this costs MONEY. The same
MONEY players payed to them to make a DE
I have to agree with Will here too. Since I installed and configured my
2.6 kernel, my CS servers run just as good on the same hardware running
Red Hat with the 2.6 test kernel as it did when I was running it on
Windows 2003.
I still have to agree on several of the other points that the original
a
Will wrote:
Just get a nice kernel and some nice spec machines and you will have no
problems
Steam servers:
3x 22-slot (4 reserved) Counter-Strike w/ adminmod 2.50.58 + statsme 2.6.17.
Hardware:
Dual Intel Xeon P4 2.8, 4Gb ECC DDR, Seagate Ultra-SCSI3 320 36.4Gb HDD,
Adaptec 39320, Intel Gigabit Et
dual_bereta_r0x wrote:
The same here. Since the 3.1.1.1 servers I get pissed cause of the bad
performance. And since the release of Steam our XP2000+ in not capable
anymore of a fluid gameplay for 2 servers. That's not only bad that's
disgusting. Besides the point that 3.1.1.1 does not bring any n
I don't understand why cpl will be STEAM!
It just sucks..
- Original Message -
From: "m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] 5 reasons i'm shutting down my HL Servers
> dual_bereta_r0x wrote:
> > etc, etc, e
Ok, I've searched on the steampowered.com forums and the list archives,
don't see any information regarding this.
I have three instances of HLDS running on my rh box, all was normal,
aside from the typical Steam issues etc... I decided to check TOP and I
see that I have five instances of HLDS runn
I think most people don't setup the servers properly, and thats the main
problem. You have to remember that valve have setup a 5year old engine to
work with our modern day machines, which in its own right is pretty
impressive. I have no issues with steam at this time, fair enough it is
pretty cpu h
try this
#/bin/sh
screen -A -m -d -S servername ./hlds_run +sv_lan 0 +insecure -game cstrike
+nomaster +port 27015 +servercfgfile server.cfg +logsdir logs +maxplayers 13
+map de_aztec +mapcyclefile mapcycle.txt
to see it from console you type:
#screen -r servername
to deatache screen type
C
dual_bereta_r0x wrote:
etc, etc, etc.
Actually, I aggree with most of what he has said. I don't have all the
same problems, but server performance is laughable for what this app
does. I think Steam is a joke too. I really don't understand what it's
purpose is. Content delivery? Cheat protectio
didn't you say you were shutting down your servers 2 months ago ? what changed then ?
-Original Message-
From: dual_bereta_r0x [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 14:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] 5 reasons i'm shutting down my HL Servers
1. Authentication DI
1. Authentication DIDN'T work. The messages "User ticket expired" and
"game is currently unavaliable" are becoming jokes. Maybe inside their
LAN auth can be done. Maybe in a few countries with huge pipes auth can
be done. Maybe someday auth can be done in a 9 of 10 tries ratio.
2. STEAM don't updat
get the patch from
ftp://ftp.hkspirit.net/pub/cstrike/linux/hlds_l_3111d_update.tar.gz for
latest cs1.5
chris
mvettas wrote:
When steam is stable i heard, so when that is , is anyones guess
- Original Message -
From: "D. Batastini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday
When steam is stable i heard, so when that is , is anyones guess
- Original Message -
From: "D. Batastini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 5:42 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5
> I've been looking through the archives and well I've yet to f
I've been looking through the archives and well I've yet to find what I'm
looking for... I was hosting a CS 1.5 server about a year ago, and I'm
looking to set up another one. However I'm unsure of what various of HLDS I
should be using? I am well aware of the security holes in 3.1.1.0, can
someone
24 matches
Mail list logo
