Hi all,
I have some questions about CS 1.6 and CS:S, hope you have the answers to
them :)
1. FPS
why is it my CS 1.6 had 3 times more FPS that my CS:S server?
CS 1.6
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
0.00 0.00 0.001457 153 494.56 0
CS:S
CPU InOut Uptime
- Original Message -
From: Marcel Beringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:34 AM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Some questions about CS 1.6 and Source
Hi all,
I have some questions about CS 1.6 and CS:S, hope you have the answers to
them :)
1.
It seems Linux is more the choice of operating systems for game servers.
Hm, but that statement might start some holy wars over OS's so I'll just
stop now :)
I run both FreeBSD with Linux emulation and native Linux as a platform for
gaming. Both have their good and bad points.
I can run any
These are standard messages when VAC detects a cheater. All clients
will get this message and its available in the server log file. And yes, it
bans
immediatly after this message.
Greets
Ronny
I don't know where those messages are coming from, but VAC never tells what
cheat caused the ban, and it
Do you want to quantify better luck?
Steve / K
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems Linux is more the choice of operating systems for game servers.
Hm, but that statement might start some holy wars over OS's so I'll just
stop now :)
I run both FreeBSD with Linux
Do you want to quantify better luck?
Steve / K
Since you asked
I'm running 4.11-STABLE on dual Athlon platform. I've not wanted to
disrupt long time existing customers to upgrade, because after my
experience from 3.x to 4.x, I start with a clean slate on full version
updates. I've got
Do you run with a stock kernel if so then that would easily
explain the difference. The newer linux's have a kernel HZ of 1000
where as FBSD has 100 this can easily be changed. 4.X requires a
kernel recompile 5.X can be set it on boot. Some people go with
1000 HZ be we found that a number of
On 4/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
updates. I've got 5.4-STABLE on newer, non-gaming servers.
5.4-RELEASE doesn't exist yet, how could you possibly have 5.4-STABLE?
Either you're running 5.4-RC3, or you're running 5.3-STABLE.
Personally I've had great luck with freebsd and
5.4-RELEASE doesn't exist yet, how could you possibly have 5.4-STABLE?
Either you're running 5.4-RC3, or you're running 5.3-STABLE.
Not true:
FreeBSD atomic.burghcom.com 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Tue Apr 5
10:27:20 EDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ATOMIC
i386
Actually if u check the CVS tree you will see RELENG_5_4 is already
a valid tag and as 5 is a STABLE branch it is technically possible to have
5.4-STABLE although I know where ur coming from :)
Steve / K
- Original Message -
From: Eric Humphries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/25/05, [EMAIL
I'm also running 200hz on a 4.x machine. It seemed to give the best
performance for CPU tradeoff. I tested 100, 200, 500 and 1000. 1000 just
ate way too much CPU and made it difficult to run more than 1 server on
a dual 2.8 xeon. Just my experiences with hz on FBSD.
-Andy
Do you run with a stock
VAC doesn't use that message. The message format for a VAC ban in the
logs is:
Secure: \%s%i%s\ was detected cheating and dropped from the
server.\n
One thing VAC certainly doesn't do is tell you the cheat it detected.
- Alfred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
What is the Kernel version and what is the name of your CPU.
It could possibly be some bad memory, you could check your memory with
this http://www.memtest.org/
On 4/23/05, LuZiFeR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since yesterday our server is catching 3 processes at one time:
3747 root 18 0
LuZiFeR wrote:
Hi,
Since yesterday our server is catching 3 processes at one time:
3747 root 18 0 85152 83m 6308 R 56.1 16.8 26:40.66 hlds_i686
3748 root 9 0 85152 83m 6308 S 0.0 16.8 0:00.00 hlds_i686
3749 root 9 0 85152 83m 6308 S 0.0 16.8 0:00.00 hlds_i686
The odd thing is, they were detected cheating and could play easily later.
That's what you should look for...
Greets
Ronny
VAC doesn't use that message. The message format for a VAC ban in the
logs is:
Secure: \%s%i%s\ was detected cheating and dropped from the
server.\n
One thing VAC certainly
you missed the point entirely. It's not VAC that is giving you those
messages, so *you* should find out what *you* have running on the
server that banned them and take it up with whoever wrote that.
Because it wasn't Valve. Valve just told you so.
On 4/25/05, Ronny Schedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check the messages, it is from VAC. Alfred posted the same
server log file message. Its extended by some more info for the
website, thats all. The message is from VAC.
you missed the point entirely. It's not VAC that is giving you those
messages, so *you* should find out what *you* have running
No. As stated before, *carefully* look at the log format listed by
Alfred and you'll see that the format is very different, and in fact
*not* from VAC. It looks more like a HLGuard entry to me...but I haven't
used that in 2 years!
Kerry
www.mikesmarauders.com
Ronny Schedel wrote:
Check the
OMG! When I say this message is from VAC, then it is from VAC!
I manage the servers and there is no other anticheat. This message
is from VAC. Did you got it now???
No. As stated before, *carefully* look at the log format listed by
Alfred and you'll see that the format is very different, and in
When someone from valve says it's not - then it's more plausible that it
is not.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ronny
Schedel
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. April 2005 00:32
An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Betreff: Re: [hlds_linux]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Is there a way of finding a player online using his steam_id, or a website
that I can do this on, all the ones I have used, like www.serverspy.net
http://www.serverspy.net/ www.game-monitor.com
It seems I talk against a wall in this mailing list.
Anyways, I hope Valve will fix this bug or avoid it
in VAC2.
http://www.kifferstuebchen.de/index.php?showpage=livestatsaccid=cs113mode=cheatergame=cstrike
Greets
Ronny
- Original Message -
From: Tobias Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Finally it makes sense,
Those are not log entries, those are DB entries populated by some sort
of log parser. You'll need to post the actual log entries if you want
valve or anyone else to respond to it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
So, in conclusion, the original text that was pasted wasn't actually
from log files, but was copied and pasted from that page, which explains
the confusion :)
-- trog
Original Message
From: Ronny Schedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 26,
There will be a HL2DM and a Source Dedicated server release within the
next couple of hours.
- Alfred
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
I have only installed HLGUARD and the kernel is 2.6.9-041221
CPU is Intel P4-3GHZ
:)
Regards LuZi
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von m0gely
Gesendet: Montag, 25. April 2005 22:44
An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Betreff: Re:
We have released an update to Half-Life 2: Deathmatch and the Source
engine. Run hldsupdatetool to get this update.
The update includes a new map for HL2DM, dm_runoff and moves the default
Steam port to 27009 (from 27030). You will also see a new message in the
console on startup once you get
--
Hello,
Thanks for the -steamport option.
--
Djo
On Apr 25, 18:29, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
We have released an update to Half-Life 2: Deathmatch and the Source
engine. Run hldsupdatetool to get this update.
The update includes a new map for HL2DM, dm_runoff and moves the default
Steam
uh, hello, when VALVE tells you the messages you pasted are NOT from
VAC, it's a pretty safe bet you're wrong...do you get it now, bucko?
heh.
On 4/25/05, Ronny Schedel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OMG! When I say this message is from VAC, then it is from VAC!
I manage the servers and there is no
Clayton Macleod wrote:
uh, hello, when VALVE tells you the messages you pasted are NOT from
VAC, it's a pretty safe bet you're wrong...do you get it now, bucko?
heh.
But arent they the same people who told us, that log file casing had
also not changed?
this was cleared up with a reply. The messages were from vac, he pasted
output from a log parser which caused confusion about the setup of vac
messages.
Read responses.
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Macleod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Monday, April
This is the next stage of our VAC2 testing. The current release includes
a couple options that we will turn on over the next couple of weeks as
our testing and validation continues. It appears that a few people have
been experimenting and found some of the new options (this is premature,
our
32 matches
Mail list logo
