Probably not what you are wanting to hear, but.. I find that sometimes
re-installing the source server from scratch has a beneficial effect on
things.
Perhaps you could try to install a server with steam into a separate
directory and running that as a test. If it stays stable, just rebuild
your
Hi everybody!
I'm gonna install a new server today. It will be a AMD Athlon 64 3500+
2.2GHz CPU with 1 GB DDR2. What I was thinking about is what OS/Dist would
be best suited for this configuration for running HLDS (Not Source).
Anyone using this setup or something close that you know work great.
There is no best distribution. There are only LSB approved or not.
Avoid suse if possible.
Use a LSB approved distribution as redhat, fedora, debian, gentoo, ...
Redhat has the most optimized kernels out of the box since their main
purpose is serving services. On the other hand EVERY linux
Thank you for your suggestion! This has been a very frustrating
experience with a formerly stable server :(
Roger
Have you moved the install location? There isn't a space in the path, is
there? Is there anything remotely non-standard about the device, file
system, or mount method? Are there
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 09:40 +1200, Andrew Forsberg wrote:
Thank you for your suggestion! This has been a very frustrating
experience with a formerly stable server :(
Roger
Have you moved the install location? There isn't a space in the path, is
there? Is there anything remotely
I have not changed the install location since the server was originally
configured a year ago. The file and directory permissions are proper for
the user running srcds. I even double checked the rights on the update
tool.
Here is more info on my system:
df -h states:
Filesystem
6 matches
Mail list logo