Re: [hlds_linux] srcds still unstable after 8/24 update

2006-09-07 Thread Regime
Probably not what you are wanting to hear, but.. I find that sometimes re-installing the source server from scratch has a beneficial effect on things. Perhaps you could try to install a server with steam into a separate directory and running that as a test. If it stays stable, just rebuild your

[hlds_linux] Best dist/os for AMD Athlon 64 and HLDS

2006-09-07 Thread Clas Karlebrink
Hi everybody! I'm gonna install a new server today. It will be a AMD Athlon 64 3500+ 2.2GHz CPU with 1 GB DDR2. What I was thinking about is what OS/Dist would be best suited for this configuration for running HLDS (Not Source). Anyone using this setup or something close that you know work great.

AW: [hlds_linux] Best dist/os for AMD Athlon 64 and HLDS

2006-09-07 Thread Simon Lange
There is no best distribution. There are only LSB approved or not. Avoid suse if possible. Use a LSB approved distribution as redhat, fedora, debian, gentoo, ... Redhat has the most optimized kernels out of the box since their main purpose is serving services. On the other hand EVERY linux

Re: [hlds_linux] srcds still unstable after 8/24 update

2006-09-07 Thread Andrew Forsberg
Thank you for your suggestion! This has been a very frustrating experience with a formerly stable server :( Roger Have you moved the install location? There isn't a space in the path, is there? Is there anything remotely non-standard about the device, file system, or mount method? Are there

Re: [hlds_linux] srcds still unstable after 8/24 update

2006-09-07 Thread Andrew Forsberg
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 09:40 +1200, Andrew Forsberg wrote: Thank you for your suggestion! This has been a very frustrating experience with a formerly stable server :( Roger Have you moved the install location? There isn't a space in the path, is there? Is there anything remotely

Re: [hlds_linux] srcds still unstable after 8/24 update

2006-09-07 Thread Roger Perkins
I have not changed the install location since the server was originally configured a year ago. The file and directory permissions are proper for the user running srcds. I even double checked the rights on the update tool. Here is more info on my system: df -h states: Filesystem