Re: [hlds_linux] FW: [hlds] Source Engine/Dedicated Server Beta Update

2007-08-16 Thread Svensk Ljud & Ljus Produktion
I did this update earlier today - but "status" still reports 3181 on our updated dods server ? Is that ok ? Peter - Original Message - From: "Mike Dussault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 9:55 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] FW: [hlds] Source Engine/Dedicated Server Be

[hlds_linux] FW: [hlds] Source Engine/Dedicated Server Beta Update

2007-08-16 Thread Mike Dussault
In case some of you guys aren't on the hlds list: Updates to the Source Engine and Source Dedicated Server Beta are available. To receive them, run hldsupdatetool with the command "-beta community". The specific changes include: - Fixed a bug in askconnect_accept - Fixed an hl2mp bug where a s

Re: [hlds_linux] FPS break on hlds

2007-08-16 Thread Valtteri Kiviniemi
Mainline kernel has only hrtimer support for i386, so if youre using 64bit OS you have to use Ingo Molnars patchset, which support x86_86. Einar S. Idsø kirjoitti: That link is to Thomas Gleixner's hires timer which has been included in the kernel since 2.6.21. Before that, some people experimen

Re: [hlds_linux] FPS break on hlds

2007-08-16 Thread Einar S. Idsø
That link is to Thomas Gleixner's hires timer which has been included in the kernel since 2.6.21. Before that, some people experimented with Ingo Molnar's hires-timer and got some very nice results. I don't know personally which is the better patch, but here's what I think is the correct link to In

Re: RE: [hlds_linux] FPS break on hlds

2007-08-16 Thread Maximilian (Mad Makz) Lotz
There you go: http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/ > I'm pretty sure the hires timer you're speaking of is already built into > the > newer kernels (HRET: High Resolution Event Timer). > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan > Devons

Re: [hlds_linux] Where did they go?

2007-08-16 Thread Einar S. Idsø
Sorry, misread your first sentence. Your *previous* Linux distro used LT while your *new* uses NPTL. But you probably figured that one out on your own ;) Einar Einar S. Idsø wrote: > Sounds like Centos 5 uses NPTL while Redhat 5 used LinuxThreads. With > NPTL the threads are a single process, whi

Re: [hlds_linux] Where did they go?

2007-08-16 Thread Einar S. Idsø
Sounds like Centos 5 uses NPTL while Redhat 5 used LinuxThreads. With NPTL the threads are a single process, while with the older LinuxThreads each thread was its own process. Run 'getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION' to check your threading library. If getconf is not available, execute /lib/libc.so.6.