RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-19 Thread James Sykes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred? >you have to remember things like ongoing support etc... You are talking about windblows ? See the recent news that win98 is no longer being supported by MS. This was their most stable OS and the best for gaming (

RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-19 Thread McCormack, Chris
age- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Sykes Sent: 19 March 2004 10:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred? I'm sure all of the big game companies do in-depth research into what the gaming population is using. When th

RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-19 Thread James Sykes
out there - you have to remember things like ongoing support etc... -Original Message- From: Mad Scientist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 March 2004 05:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred? According to the great words of James Sykes:

RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-18 Thread Mad Scientist
According to the great words of James Sykes: > For the time being I don't think the Linux gamer represents a large > enough percentage of players to spend time and money on, especially > on such an aging game. Use Winex or something. Everybody I know who left HL and moved to UT or ET did so becaus

RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-18 Thread Mad Scientist
According to the great words of James Sykes: > As a business decision it is very simple. How much money will it take > to develop an application on Linux and how much money will it make. Develop? No, port. 95% of the code is already portable. All the game logic and all the OpenGL code. The only "W

RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-18 Thread James Sykes
? -Original Message- From: James Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 March 2004 03:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred? On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:45:18AM -, James Sykes wrote: > > No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to? >

Re: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-18 Thread James Clark
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 March 2004 02:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred? > > > If you want to play games then stick to Windows. > > No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to? > > I can play these games under li

RE: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-18 Thread James Sykes
age- From: James Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 March 2004 02:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred? > If you want to play games then stick to Windows. No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to? I can play these games under linux: enemy-te

[OT] Re: [hlds_linux] No memoryleak alfred?

2004-03-18 Thread James Clark
> If you want to play games then stick to Windows. No. Fuck that. Why should I _have_ to? I can play these games under linux: enemy-territory ut2004 never winter nights doom3 (not yet, but JC has said it will happen) quake3 There is no argument against linux being a viable platform f