hondaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| About the only perl I know is man perl :/
actually, it's perldoc perl :)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| gt; gt; And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
| gt;
| gt; Which is BS
| gt; It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
| gt; higher fps as a end resoult, most likely dependent on if you
|
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Yup. Sadly.
So you have to run insecure if you are running C-D?
What's so sad about that?
It lowers the CPU req on your servers.
And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
Which is BS
It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
Which is BS
It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
higher fps as a end resoult, most likely dependent on if you
are CPU limited or Vidcard limited in your current FPS.
Can you explain how exactly C-D could
where do you get the fps for a linux server ?
- Original Message -
From: Eric (Deacon) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] [No C-D] Stripping from stats
And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half
gt; gt; And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
gt;
gt; Which is BS
gt; It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
gt; higher fps as a end resoult, most likely dependent on if you
gt; are CPU limited or Vidcard limited in your current FPS.
Can you
smpss By removing player models from the field of vision that you cannot see you
smpss decrease the amount of overdraw of playermodels happening on your screen (the
smpss effect you get by a tilerendering card like Kryo-2, just to a lesser degree).
smpss The vidcard not having to draw players you
Crimony.
?
I believe it's an exclamation. I don't know what you'd say in NZ,
but I'm sure in London it'd be similar to saying something like
blimey! Or geez, or whatever...
Yeah. Sheesh, geez, man..., that sort of expression, but
I guess a regional one :)
Heh, Gary Larson
Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
Yup. Sadly.
So you have to run insecure if you are running C-D?
What's so sad about that?
It lowers the CPU req on your servers.
The only sad part I can think of is that running your server in
insecure mode is the only way to block the cheats...
--
/Stefan
Yup. Sadly.
So you have to run insecure if you are running C-D?
What's so sad about that?
It lowers the CPU req on your servers.
And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 12:53, Kingsley Foreman wrote:
wouldn't be hard to do just add something like
$name =~ s/[No C-D]//;
to a line after it gets the log but before it does anything with it
but make sure u have perl knowledge
Yeah its more a time restraint problem I have.
I plan on
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:58:16PM +1300, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
I plan on running CD for a few days optional, until people get the hint
to install it.
Do what I do. Don't run C-D during the week and make it required during
the weekend. I'm starting to get the feeling that C-D is going to
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:06, James Clark wrote:
Do what I do. Don't run C-D during the week and make it required during
the weekend. I'm starting to get the feeling that C-D is going to need
an update very shortly, starting to see unnatural BS even with C-D =(
All my regulars have it and
perl knowledge
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Brooking [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] [No C-D] Stripping from stats
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 12:36, Mike Hodgkinson wrote:
I just deny players
How is the new C-D able to work if it is not hooking the client .dll anymore?
--- Jeremy Brooking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:06, James Clark wrote:
Do what I do. Don't run C-D during the week and make it required during
the weekend. I'm starting to get the feeling
Works fine. But, no white space in front and no extra junk in back is
also good.
$name =~ s/\s*\[No C-D\].*\n//g; does the trick.
e.g. This is a dumb name [No C-D] blah! would be shortened to
This is a dumb name.
You would place this in the hlstats or psychostats or whatevers script
where it
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 07:50:11PM -0800, agenthh wrote:
Works fine. But, no white space in front and no extra junk in back is
also good.
$name =~ s/\s*\[No C-D\].*\n//g; does the trick.
e.g. This is a dumb name [No C-D] blah! would be shortened to
This is a dumb name.
The [No C-D] tag
True.
$name =~ s/\[No C-D\]\s*$//g;
Only strips off the [No C-D] and any following white space at the end of
line.
But, just think of the problems if there is a clan called [No C-D] :)
--agenthh
Blaine Kahle wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 07:50:11PM -0800, agenthh wrote:
Works fine. But, no
In Psychostats the only thing we did was in the denyclan.cfg add this line.
clan: [No C-D]
Foad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| True.
| $name =~ s/\[No C-D\]\s*$//g;
| Only strips off the [No C-D] and any following white space at the end
| of line.
|
| But, just think of the problems if there is a
19 matches
Mail list logo
