Man...is it just me, or has this list gotten stupider and stupider since
I started lurking?
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
Nelson Marques wrote:
Ur a funny guy, and special, I would go calling names into people... but
since when does a AMD MP matches a Intel Xeon ? not in this world mate.
I will be c
]
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
>Well, we stop renting halflife servers this weekend.
>New games are ready to rent for us (most Q3 engine, which runs really
I recall a website that showed the number of players playing each game...
Anyone know of a site, or sites, that d
his is unplayable.
- Original Message -
From: "James Sykes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
Brett - nobody cares about your opinion.
To everyone else:
Everyone has their
sed
server uses PC2600 ECC. Why do you need more for ?
Nelson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shane
Robinett aka Weaver
Sent: 23 November 2003 13:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
You guys sounds like a team
er 23, 2003 1:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
If you cant run 50 slots on a dual xeon 2.66ghz then your problem is not
with valve although they do suck. The problem is you and your server.
Next time spend your money on a real company like AMD. Intel is fo
>Well, we stop renting halflife servers this weekend.
>New games are ready to rent for us (most Q3 engine, which runs really
I recall a website that showed the number of players playing each game...
Anyone know of a site, or sites, that do that?? I'm just interested to see
where the trend is go
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
Actually - he's right regarding Valves software... they develop on AMD
-
and compile under AMD - so it makes sense it runs / performs better
under
AMD.
- Original Mess
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
Actually - he's right regarding Valves software... they develop on AMD -
and compile under AMD - so it makes sense it runs / performs better under
AMD.
- Original Message -
TECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Fernicola
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 1:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
>
> If you cant run 50 slots on a dual xeon 2.66ghz then your problem is not
> with valve
Brett Fernicola wrote:
>
> AT LEAST WHEN I CALL SOMEONE A MORON I GIVE FACTS TO BACK MY SELF UP YOU
> DUMB SHIT.
>
> Think about trying reiser fs filesystem it is a lot faster at handeling
> small files. This reduced my load times a lot with slackware 9.1
Yeah, right, and HL has so many so extre
er 22, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS CS 1.5 or 1.6
> real company like AMD
I'm not quite sure where you got that from
Considering Intel have more than 80% market share and AMD only have 15%
it seems not many people agree with you there.
Stop talking shit - it only
11 matches
Mail list logo
