Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-14 Thread Eric (Deacon)
Daniel Stroven wrote: As far as rcon being required in rental situationswhat I find is the only reason customers "require" rcon is because of HLSW or similiar programs that give remote control thru a 3rd party program via rcon password. AM/AMX do not give you the ability to do remote commands,

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-14 Thread Florian Zschocke
EnemySpy wrote: a) I agree that having an interface to the server where you have a dedicated input line which doesn't get overwritten by the server output is very desireable. I've been wishing for this for quite some time now. I redirect my console to a pipe, which is read from (and processed) by

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-14 Thread EnemySpy
> A VERY simple yet VERY useful addition to the HLDS console would be GREATLY > appreciated: if the > console window took up all of the lines on the screen except > the last one where the admin would enter > commands. It is difficult to change a cvar from the server console when there is > cons

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-14 Thread Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg
Fifth! -a- Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg Appleton: 920-738-9032 System Administrator ExtremePC LLC-=- http://www.extremepcgaming.net On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Matt Gossage wrote: > I fourth it :-)

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-14 Thread Matt Gossage
I fourth it :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mad Scientist Sent: 09 August 2003 07:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request According to the great words of Tony Di Schino: > I third

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-11 Thread Emanuel Harangus
Sixth!! - Original Message - From: "Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 3:27 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* F

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-11 Thread Mikkel \"Miklos\" Georgsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate to say it (no i dont) but I want NO new features. I don't even want any more bug fixes (unless for exploit). ALL I want is code optimization so hlds will use less CPU. I say down with anything else. You hit the spot there Jeremy - no new features, only code optimazat

RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-11 Thread Tim Mekrakarn
AMEN to that! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 11:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request I hate to say it (no i dont) but I want NO new

Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Console *SIMPLE* Feature Request

2003-08-11 Thread Eric (Deacon)
Emanuel Harangus wrote: Sixth!! And 7th, and 8th, and on, and on... I think we get the picture: people want an actual input line that isn't interrupted by scrolling console output. -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences