--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
-----Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kno
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:03:09PM -0600, Jay Carter wrote:
> what's it going to take to get some action from you guys?
Silence doesn't have to mean there is no action. It's the time of year
when people take time off work gets a bit lax etc. No news is good news -
lets hope like hell!
Unfortuna
At Thursday 08:42 PM 12/19/2002 +0100, you wrote:
I rather waste a bit of my energy in trying to tell Valve they have to
speed up, than trying to guess who's cheating on my servers.
/Douglas
I totally agree. In the last 14 days, VAC has caught 1 player on my server.
That's pathetic. It's har
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 08:42, Douglas Nilsson wrote:
> I rather waste a bit of my energy in trying to tell Valve they have to
> speed up, than trying to guess who's cheating on my servers.
>
Touche!
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view
ECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Next VAC-update?
I think there is alot of wasted engery going on here.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please
I think there is alot of wasted engery going on here.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/list
No they don't!
HLGuard is server side, and can only prevent information from being sent to
the client, while CDeath was server side and hooked into openGL, and had
complete control on the client (theoretically, of course :>).
Correct me if i'm wrong, but CDeath also prevented hooking?
--
M
ED]] On Behalf Of KnowHow
The NetCrawler
Sent: den 18 december 2002 15:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Next VAC-update?
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 15:39, Douglas Nilsson wrote:
> The reason for CD's death is still not the issue here.
> My point lies in the rest
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 15:39, Douglas Nilsson wrote:
> The reason for CD's death is still not the issue here.
> My point lies in the rest of my mail.
>
> /Douglas
>
Yes, but you have no way of knowing if CD would be able to stop the cheats
that live today, or even if it did, if it would be
18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Next VAC-update?
Douglas Nilsson wrote:
> That wasn't my point.
> I can understand why he stopped develop CD when Valve made it useless,
> can't you?
No, I can't. (Yes, I can but for different reasons). There are
over 125 MODs
He stopped because.. He likes CS?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Douglas Nilsson wrote:
That wasn't my point.
I can understand why he stopped develop CD when Valve made it useless,
can't you?
No, I can't. (Yes, I can but for different reasons). There are
over 125 MODs available for HL IIRC. There are at least 10 popular
multiplayer MODs that you will find ser
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Florian
Zschocke
Sent: den 18 december 2002 12:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Next VAC-update?
Douglas Nilsson wrote:
> And this guy had CD up-to-date at least untill Valve introduced VAC.
Apparently CD d
Douglas Nilsson wrote:
And this guy had CD up-to-date at least untill Valve introduced VAC.
Apparently CD development stopped in July. Which brings me back to
my question if it is effective against current cheats.
Florian.
--
Want to produce professional emails and Usenet postings?
http://www
If you want to read more about CD:
http://www.cheating-death.com/cddiff.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Douglas
Nilsson
Sent: den 18 december 2002 11:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Next VAC-update?
As far as I
As far as I know you can't use CD on a mod that's VAC-protected.
I think CD still works on no-VAC mods.
And this guy had CD up-to-date at least untill Valve introduced VAC.
I've never felt so "secure" when my cs-servers ran CD.
It realy worked!
So until Valve convinces me, which they still haven't,
Hm... Was there any BETA (really beta, the ones that are released
for testing only) of CS 1.6 released ?
Because, from the URL below I found this:
Counter Strike 1.6 Hacks ...
multihack, new : fps fix on the menu and added target filter
The readme file is in Chinese AND then English...
Jay Carter wrote:
It may force cheat writers to
not make their works public which again lowers the number of overall
cheaters. Why make a cheat public if its going to be squashed within a few
days? I'd rather have 10 cheaters using a private hack than 10,000 cheaters
using a public hack.
No ob
At Wednesday 08:33 AM 12/18/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Jay Carter wrote:
I'm not
asking for a "Server Admin Appreciation Day" but timely anticheat updates
would be enough to keep me from never bitching. If you're not or can't
update the stuff in a timely manner then hire someone who can.
You do re
I run a tfc server and admin at another. One big problem is that we have to
rely on experience to properly keep the servers cheat free. After over two
years in the community, I still lack the knowledge to be able to detect
cheaters. Sure, I can catch a lot, but I know I am missing a lot as do othe
Jay Carter wrote:
I'm not
asking for a "Server Admin Appreciation Day" but timely anticheat updates
would be enough to keep me from never bitching. If you're not or can't
update the stuff in a timely manner then hire someone who can.
You do realize, however, that your servers will never ever be
very well said.
hear! hear!
> In closing, I'm really not trying to bag on Valve. I have a very good idea
> what kind of situations they are working under and I can understand that
> there are a lot of irons in the fire. However, it would be nice if they
> took a look from our perspective and rea
22 matches
Mail list logo
