Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS on dual Xeon 64bit procs

2005-06-11 Thread Clayton Macleod
everyone's experience with 64bit intels has been poor. This is why everyone buys amd, opteron or athlon64. On 6/10/05, Matt Donnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > my experience with 64bit intels suggest that its rather a pointless > addition. > Personally I'd go option #4 which is sell it and get som

Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS on dual Xeon 64bit procs

2005-06-10 Thread Matt Donnon
my experience with 64bit intels suggest that its rather a pointless addition. Personally I'd go option #4 which is sell it and get some real 64 bitters, but its probably too late for that now. My choice would be between option 1 which is a known thing, and option 3 which is somewhat unpredictable

Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS on dual Xeon 64bit procs

2005-06-10 Thread Sid Stuart
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] In general the benchmarks I have seen show 64-bit binaries running on a 64-bit OS run the fastest. This is due to the eight extra registers the processor makes available under that circumstance. I have

[hlds_linux] SRCDS on dual Xeon 64bit procs

2005-06-09 Thread steve
We just bought a new Dell 1425 with Dual 64bit Xeon Proc's, and are wondering what the best option would be. I can think of 3 options, but if there are others, feel free to point them out to me... 1)install 32bit OS using Steam 2)install 64bit OS, with a nested 32bit chroot with Steam 3)install