Oh, the build from topics is from srcds...
/Bjorn
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, kama wrote:
>
> Actually
>
> rcon version gives me
> Exe build: 20:06:30 Mar 7 2006 (3421)
>
> by doing some calculation with turning it back and forth from epoch it
> will give me a date (using the timezone America/Los_Ange
Actually
rcon version gives me
Exe build: 20:06:30 Mar 7 2006 (3421)
by doing some calculation with turning it back and forth from epoch it
will give me a date (using the timezone America/Los_Angeles, since I dont
get the timezone in the build info).
Thu Oct 24 21:06:30 PDT 1996
I believe HL1
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
Has it been 7,6273972602739726027397260273973 years already? :)
//Regards JT
Alfred Reynolds wrote:
That number is the number of days since HL1 was released. We don't really use
it any longer, internally we use perforce changelist numbers and externally we
u
On Friday 30 June 2006 4:43 am, kama wrote:
> Gah, too simple...
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
> > That number is the number of days since HL1 was released. We don't really
> > use it any longer, internally we use perforce changelist numbers and
> > externally we use Steam depot v
d is it necessary to
update "Counter-Strike" servers too? Or is it more "Day of Defeat" stuff?
- Original Message -
From: "Alfred Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 8:45 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] exe build: 12:02:12 Jun 22 2
Seconded. Try moving to "ln(perforce_build * (1337 * unix_timestamp))". ;-)
~~ Ondra
kama wrote:
Gah, too simple...
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
That number is the number of days since HL1 was released. We don't really use
it any longer, internally we use perforce changelist
Gah, too simple...
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
> That number is the number of days since HL1 was released. We don't really use
> it any longer, internally we use perforce changelist numbers and externally
> we use Steam depot versions. Still, doesn't hurt to have it lying aroun
That number is the number of days since HL1 was released. We don't really use
it any longer, internally we use perforce changelist numbers and externally we
use Steam depot versions. Still, doesn't hurt to have it lying around.
- Alfred
Evaldas Žilinskas wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in
Build numbers are often calculated... This way it will never be the same
verision.
This is how some calculate the builds...
( Year - 2000 ) * 1000 + ( Month * 50 ) + ( Day )
With this forumula we would get the build number for todays date
(2006-06-29) to be 6329.
Dont know what formula valve t
On Thursday 29 June 2006 7:42 am, Ondřej Hošek wrote:
> I'd hazard a guess that it's the build number. I'm not sure when Valve
> increments it, but I would expect them to do so whenever they introduce
> a new feature or fix a bug.
Or when they introduce a new bug or fix a feature. :)
-John Sheu
I'd hazard a guess that it's the build number. I'm not sure when Valve
increments it, but I would expect them to do so whenever they introduce
a new feature or fix a bug. Since quite a few of the builds are internal
and/or licensor-only, the updates to the Source/Goldsource engines we
get via Stea
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Can anyone tell me, what's 2784?
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/
12 matches
Mail list logo
