Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread matt_gossage
bject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote: > > Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I > > had to shut down my server b/c of it. > > - Multicast spectator added. > - Vo

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Matthew Watson
I run a teamspeak server, which doesn't seem to use up much cpu, the server shouldn't really have to do any processing on the voice so it shouldn't use up much cpu I wouldn't imagine. (Bandwidth perhaps) Matt. --On Thursday, 20 February 2003 7:27 PM -0800 Mad Scientist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Clark ->Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:18 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf -> -> ->On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Mad Scientist
James Clark said: > - Voice communication added. <-- hate it (so much) I disabled v-comm - didn't seem to have any effect on CPU usage. -Mad ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valveso

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread James Clark
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:11:40PM -0500, Justin Mitchell wrote: > Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I > had to shut down my server b/c of it. - Multicast spectator added. - Voice communication added. <-- hate it (so much) I'd say these did it. Not entire

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Justin Mitchell
Yah, if i recall correctly 1.3 used gobs more cpu than previous versions. I had to shut down my server b/c of it. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Matthew Watson
7;ll barely handle 10 - Original Message - From: "Kevin Gerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf Hey, I remember when HL came out and a P3-500 was a 'dream server'

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Justin Mitchell
My celeron 400 used to be full 24/7 with 20 players... and everyone pinged under 20. Now it'll barely handle 10 - Original Message - From: "Kevin Gerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:48 PM Subject: Re: [

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Kevin Gerry
will probably be buying ONly amd servers from now on > > > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > > > &g

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread matt_gossage
Message - From: "Daniel Albuschat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:33 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > > > > I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.

Re: [hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Timothy Nelson
I have Intel Nic , redhat 7.2, kernel 2.4.19 and the same problems of perf : lags and high cpu usage. Timothy - Original Message - From: "Rob Poe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:47 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] re: Se

[hlds_linux] re: Server Perf

2003-02-20 Thread Rob Poe
I have a RedHat 7.3 (2.4.18-24.7.x) box (P4 1.9, 512mb ram, SCSI disks) that experiences WEIRD lag issues (lag spikes) with Day of Defeat 3.1 When I have > 13 people in it, and up to 21 people, the spikes are often and continuous. The processor on the box rarely hits more than 70% even with 20 pe