I'm currently looking at 1U rack mount systems to host some TF2
servers. Power consumption is a big factor in long term costs, so I'm
looking for a system with an optimum power to speed ratio.
At the moment, a system with a quad core Xeon X3220 2.4GHz CPU seems to
be optimal. Would it be possible
: Sunday, November 11, 2007 1:18 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] srcds performance on Xeon quad core?
I'm currently looking at 1U rack mount systems to host some TF2
servers. Power consumption is a big factor in long term costs, so I'm
looking for a system with an optimum power to speed ratio.
At the moment
I thought the Core 2 processors (can't find the name of the quad
equivalent) were better on power consumption than Xeon processors. As
far as I know, even the quad core AMD's are better on power consumption
than Xeons. Someone correct me if I am wrong please... :)
Drek
Adam James wrote:
I'm
Actually, the technical difference between Xeon and Core 2 is minimal.
AFAIK, a Xeon is slightly better than the equivalent Core 2 Extreme, but
I haven't done much research.
~~ Ondra
On 11.11.07 13:54 Uhr, Crazy Canucks wrote:
I thought the Core 2 processors (can't find the name of the quad
Crazy Canucks wrote:
I thought the Core 2 processors (can't find the name of the quad
equivalent)
They are both named Core 2. The 2 core versions are named Duo and the
4 Core versions are named Quad ;)
were better on power consumption than Xeon processors. As
far as I know, even the quad core
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:54:31 -0400
Crazy Canucks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the Core 2 processors (can't find the name of the quad
equivalent) were better on power consumption than Xeon processors. As
far as I know, even the quad core AMD's are better on power
consumption than Xeons.
As far as I know the socket 771 Xeon does use about 40% less power then the
775 ones.
-LeAdGuEsT
- Original Message -
From: Ondřej Hošek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds performance on Xeon
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:51:55 +0100
Svensk Ljud Ljus Produktion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running 1 TF2 on each core is the best you can do, and it shouldnt be
any problems with 24 slots, you may even try to raise after testing.
Make shure you got plenty of memory !
Thanks Peter. I have an 18
Ok, I wasn't aware of that, in that case you probably won't find
anything better for power consumption currently available.
Drek
Adam James wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:54:31 -0400
Crazy Canucks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the latest Xeon processors are based upon the Core 2 processor. In
PROTECTED]
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds performance on Xeon quad core?
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:51:55 +0100
Svensk Ljud Ljus Produktion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running 1 TF2 on each core is the best you can do
performance on Xeon quad core?
Actually, the technical difference between Xeon and Core 2 is minimal.
AFAIK, a Xeon is slightly better than the equivalent Core 2 Extreme, but
I haven't done much research.
~~ Ondra
On 11.11.07 13:54 Uhr, Crazy Canucks wrote:
I thought the Core 2 processors (can't find
An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Betreff: Re: [hlds_linux] srcds performance on Xeon quad core?
From wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeon#Dual-Core_Xeon)
Just comparing 3Ghz procs:
3085 xeon has a TDP of 65W socket 771
5160 xeon has a TDP of 80W socket LGA775
Core2duo E6850 has a TDP of 65W
12 matches
Mail list logo
