RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
->Also, I don't know if this is even legal or not but I've made a Linux ->distro based on the Gentoo Live CD that boots directly into a perl based ->system where you enter some settings and it spawns either a cstrike, ->dod, tfc, or dmc server. It auto detects your LAN card. You supply the ->mod

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread Matthew Donnon
absolutly - Original Message - From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 7:52 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance > . > -> > ->Also, I don't know if this is even leg

RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
. -> ->Also, I don't know if this is even legal or not but I've made a Linux ->distro based on the Gentoo Live CD that boots directly into a perl based ->system where you enter some settings and it spawns either a cstrike, ->dod, tfc, or dmc server. It auto detects your LAN card. You supply the -

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread kama
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, kama wrote: > My server is running pingbooster3 on a p3 500.. and the CPU usage are then > up to 80%... Oh, I switched from wwcl to hlg.. and let hlg just do the same thing wwcl did.. the load went down 10%! I did not know that wwcl was such of a CPU hog... csadmin 73465 69

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread Me
t out > much and away from the computer? > > -Andy > > - Original Message - > From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 8:56 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance >

RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread Adam Pearse
tt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 19, 2003 7:50 AM To: hlds Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance I don't really trust your test results that much but HLDS does run great on the kernel 2.2.x series. What would be cool is if you could do some testing using the sa

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread Matt
I don't really trust your test results that much but HLDS does run great on the kernel 2.2.x series. What would be cool is if you could do some testing using the same distribution running 2.4.x kernels compiled on different platforms with different optimizations. Like i386 vs AMD Athlon-XP kerne

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-19 Thread kama
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Andy Hodges wrote: > During the past week I have done some research and ran a few tests using > different platforms. Initially, I asked what Linux flavor everyone was using > and most people said RedHat, FreeBSD, and Debian. I installed all of these > flavors on different linu

RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
>kernel they were prviously using. -> -> ->- Original Message - ->From: "Oscar N aka 'Dreadful'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:54 AM ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance -> ->

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread DLinkOZ
Oscar N aka 'Dreadful'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance Didn't someone discovered that the cpu usage changed very much in the kernel version above 2.4.9 or som

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread DLinkOZ
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance > RedHat sucks. ;) > > -Andy > > - Original Message - > From: "Oscar N aka 'Dreadful'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL P

RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Mad Scientist
Kevin J. Anderson said: > well, i do because I have ext3 on all my servers. : P You can mount an ext3 filesystem as ext2. It just won't keep a journal. Mount it sync and you shouldn't have a problem. -Mad ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferenc

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Florian Zschocke
"Kevin J. Anderson" wrote: > > well, i do because I have ext3 on all my servers. : P That shouldn't matter. The good thing about Ext3 is that you can mount it as Ext2. Florian. -- Want to produce professional emails and Usenet postings? http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html __

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Oscar N aka 'Dreadful'
EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance -> -> ->Well you don't need EXT3 for a game server. But you're right, it ->would have ->to be a custom job. -> well, i do because I have ext3 on all my servers. : P kev

RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Hodges ->Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:40 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance -> -> ->Well you don't need EXT3 for

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Andy Hodges
Well you don't need EXT3 for a game server. But you're right, it would have to be a custom job. -Andy - Original Message - From: "Kevin J. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:31 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_li

RE: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
->> -> ->Have you tried running kernel 2.2.x on any of the other distros? -> ->Tomorrow I will try to install 2.2.x on my gentoo server, since I have had ->nothing but high pings since I swapped away from debian, but I totally in ->love with gentoo, and since I run it on my own machine as well, I

Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Results - Performance

2003-03-18 Thread Jeremy Brooking
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:19, Andy Hodges wrote: > RedHat sucks. ;) > > -Andy Dont get into a distro pissing contest again. Redhat has its place, and that place it fills well. Slackware has its place (lack of people working on it has let it down) and that place it fits well. Debian has its place