uh, because it was a joke making fun of someone else asking for help
that was boneheaded enough to run a linux server in a virtual machine
running on win2003.
On 6/27/05, Eric (Deacon) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You never did ask a question or point out an area in which you need help.
--
Cla
In a bold display of creativity, EqualHate wrote:
I have a mac mini that I manage to load VirtualPC onto from MS, and run
a linux virtual server on top of that layer so that I could run the
SRCDS linux version
You never did ask a question or point out an area in which you need help.
--
Eric (t
A Mac Mini's processing power and hardware isn't server class at
all... that said no matter what you do you will not get good
performance from srcds or anything else that can be
processor-demanding from it. Sorry to burst you bubble. There is a
reason its cheap.
-sb
On 6/25/05, EqualHate <[EMAI
I am realy curious why you chose to run linux virtual servers under
Win2k3 for hlds.
he's a masochist?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linu
I was also hoping the very smart people could help me,
I have a mac mini that I manage to load VirtualPC onto from MS, and run
a linux virtual server on top of that layer so that I could run the
SRCDS linux version
My server seems to be having lag issues but everything is installed
correctly.
I w
Sorry, are you nuts? He asked for advice, but he's running a gaming
server for customers on via an emulation layer? 'You should run whatever
you think is the best' is fine, but he was having trouble, and his
clients are paying for something they're obviously not getting.
Gah, I'm wasting my time.
You should run whatever you think is the best. :) Don't run what others
tell you, because if it doesn't
"Pan out" you can't blame anyone but yourself.
At 02:02 AM 6/25/2005, Andrew Forsberg wrote:
you HAVE to run it like that?
May I ask why?
He's being held hostage by a slightly MS-brainwa
you HAVE to run it like that?
May I ask why?
He's being held hostage by a slightly MS-brainwashed penguin that can't make
up it's mind on OS?
Run linux!
no, windows!
no, linux!
no, windows!
Seriously, this sounds like the "worst of both worlds" solution. Why in
$DIETY's name would you run
On Friday, June 24, 2005 8:59 PM:
DaiTengu [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoke forth:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:15:27 -0500, Michael Webber
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No, I have to run it like this. I dont want opinions on
>> getting rid of virtual server. Im asking if you know
>> the answer or solutio
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:15:27 -0500, Michael Webber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, I have to run it like this. I dont want opinions on getting rid of
virtual server. Im asking if you know the answer or solution other then
getting rid of virtual server. If you dont dont reply.
you HAVE to
You own a game server hosting company? *Shudder*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Webber
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 1:20 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds_linux] Linux on virutal server
Hello. Please read th
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
> >To:
> >Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux on virutal server
> >Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:27:04 -0400
> >
> >There is no "solution" you cheap bastard. Either you own/rent/lea
what makes you think anyone's mad? zoner. Looks like the server's
owning you, actually.
On 6/24/05, Michael Webber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nevermind smart ass. I fixed it. Dont have to get mad becusae you dont
> know the answer. I turned off windows 2003 servers anti dos attack.No
> go
com
To:
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux on virutal server
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:27:04 -0400
There is no "solution" you cheap bastard. Either you own/rent/lease the box
or you don't. If you do then you run it on the main OS install. If you
don't
then you take your cheap
you're never going to have servers worth playing on running them like
that. CostCo's got cluesticks real cheap, go get some.
On 6/24/05, Michael Webber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I have to run it like this. I dont want opinions on getting rid of
> virtual server. Im asking if you know the
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Webber
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 6:15 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Linux on virutal server
No, I have to run it like this. I dont want opinions on getting rid of
virtual server. Im asking if you know the answ
upport.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sid Stuart
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 5:19 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux on virutal server
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from mul
Behalf Of Sid Stuart
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 5:19 PM
To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux on virutal server
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Though I am tempted, I will not ask why anyone would configure
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Though I am tempted, I will not ask why anyone would configure a server
in such a way.
From your description, it sounds like the virtual server software is
dropping packets. I would suggest usin
19 matches
Mail list logo
