On Nov 22, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Russ White wrote:
This is, generally speaking, how current home routers work... And, I
think, it might be the only way to make a homenet work. The primary key
beyond this is a device being able to figure out I'm an edge to the
outside world.
Yeah, I don't think
Home routers with a natural WAN interface such as DSL or Docsis are built from
reference designs that hardwire the internet interface, including any
firewall-like functionality
Randy
Original message
Subject: Re: [homenet] Creating a security association via physical link +
A physical button, or a virtual button?
I don't want to do mechanical engineering here. And buttons are expensive.
Lee
From: homenet-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:homenet-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Lorenzo Colitti
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 3:02 AM
To: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: [homenet]
Ray asked for people to post drafts for anything other than OSPF, because
without an alternative, it will appear that we have consensus on OSPF. I
haven't posted a draft on RIPng, because it would just work the way it's
designed.
A few people said
On the point of autoconfig…in future references to OSPF, can I substitute zOSPF
? I'm assuming that we're not talking about deploying an off-the-shelf OSPF
implementation because of the configuration impact on a home network consumer.
So I was also assuming that I could substitute zOSPF
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 23:36, Howard, Lee lee.how...@twcable.com wrote:
Ray asked for people to post drafts for anything other than OSPF, because
without an alternative, it will appear that we have consensus on OSPF. I
haven't posted a draft on RIPng, because it would just work the way it's
On Nov 23, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Randy Turner wrote:
We still have the ongoing discussion of how to make all this
auto-configurable...
Which I think is the more significant piece And why we cannot simply accept
just use RIPng on its own. We have to see what any routing protocol is going
to
