Re: [homenet] Creating a security association via physical link + button

2011-11-26 Thread Robert Cragie
I've been following this thread with interest. Some points (from someone who has a particular 802.15.4-based mesh networking viewpoint): * There probably isn't any need to specify cryptographic security for an IGP on the basis that the packets are link-local and can therefore be protected

Re: [homenet] other routing options

2011-11-26 Thread Teco Boot
Op 26 nov. 2011, om 03:17 heeft Russ White het volgende geschreven: > >> TRILL is not an IP routing protocol. It's a layer 2 bridging protocol more >> complicated than the spanning tree, and seems completely unnecessary for >> the small size of bridged networks to be expected in homenets. > > W

Re: [homenet] Creating a security association via physical link + button

2011-11-26 Thread Acee Lindem
I agree - once we have a threat document, this should one of the security models on which we map the threats. Thanks, Acee On Nov 26, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Robert Cragie wrote: > I've been following this thread with interest. Some points (from someone who > has a particular 802.15.4-based mesh netw

Re: [homenet] Creating a security association via physical link + button

2011-11-26 Thread Ted Lemon
On Nov 26, 2011, at 4:52 AM, Robert Cragie wrote: > Network access control can set up secure channels to deliver keying > information. It sounds like you're talking about some kind of central management software/protocol here. ___ homenet mailing list