>
>
> 0) Have you managed to get ipv6 working at all? If so, how? What sort
> of problems did you encounter?
>
Yes. I use DIR-855L at home, PPPoE. The only problem I have so far is my
ISP gives only /64 via PD.
>
> 1) Have you attempted to deploy a routing protocol in your home? Which
> one, and
> So, there are limitations like:
> struct router all_the_routers[256];
>
> and then there are protocol collapses due to taking the entire channel for
> adjacencies as happened with OLPC.
We're in full agreement about most of what you say. Are you happy with
the current wording, or are you sugges
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> So assuming some decent high-power 802.11ac in the Bradford house
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_Is_Enough) to link the per-room
router to
>> legacy 802.11b and per-person (phone) router to BTLE/PAN, it means we
have
>> about 30 routers on th
On 23.2.2015, at 18.51, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
> Another question -- is it possible to participate in Trickle-driven
> flooding without building the full topology graph?
>
> If not, that's a little disappointing, since Trickle is designed so that
> it can be implemented while knowing just my
On 23.2.2015, at 17.24, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
>> post MTU, or in secure mode, it should just use the Short one (which is
>> of fixed length).
> Ok. So I send multicast SNS. I receive NSR. I'm supposed to send LSR,
> right? But it doesn't fit in maximum packet size, even with fragmentation
> So assuming some decent high-power 802.11ac in the Bradford house
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_Is_Enough) to link the per-room router to
> legacy 802.11b and per-person (phone) router to BTLE/PAN, it means we have
> about 30 routers on the wifi.
I'm under opposing pressures relating to
Hi Michael,
The work on the document is being done on https://github.com/choppsv1
and I try to keep an up-to-date version of the generated files on
http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~jch/private/draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-XX.html
http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~jch/private/dr
>> The minimum MTU in IPv6 is 1280 bytes, and the minimum maximum packet size
>> (before fragmentation) is 1500 bytes.
> I assume you refer to Long Network Status (on multicast);
Yes, sorry.
> post MTU, or in secure mode, it should just use the Short one (which is
> of fixed length).
Ok. So I
When a host connects to a different link covered by a different subnet,
indeed it will require a new IP address. That's pretty fundamental to what
a subnet is. Hosts are getting better and better at handling multiple
addresses, of both versions, coming and going. MPTCP should continue to
help in th
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Ole Troan wrote:
are you replying to the point I made? cause fully functioning MHMP
requires host support (read MP-TCP/session layer) regardless of moving
or not.
If I extrapolated correctly what Juliusz wrote, that is not what he had in
mind.
with regards to a proposa
>>> On 21 Feb 2015, at 16:06 , Juliusz Chroboczek
>>> wrote:
>>>
> The client is running a stub implementation of the routing protocol.
>>>
I thought we already had decided we didn't require changes to the host?
>>>
>>> We don't *require* changes to the host. We propose optional host
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Ole Troan wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015, at 16:06 , Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
The client is running a stub implementation of the routing protocol.
I thought we already had decided we didn't require changes to the host?
We don't *require* changes to the host. We propose o
> On 21 Feb 2015, at 16:06 , Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>
>>> The client is running a stub implementation of the routing protocol.
>
>> I thought we already had decided we didn't require changes to the host?
>
> We don't *require* changes to the host. We propose optional host
> modification
On 23.2.2015, at 4.57, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
> I have a few questions and comments about DNCP. (I haven't finished
> grokking HNCP yet, so that will have to wait.)
Thanks, we definitely need more eyes on this (keepalive logic was actually
flawed in -00, but I dare you to find it without lo
Just a quick reminder to the WG that the submission cut-off date for Internet
Drafts is two weeks today, at 23:59 UTC on March 9th.
Ray
___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
15 matches
Mail list logo
