I am glad, incidentally, that for the first time, this wg is
considering some of the problems wifi has, and growing towards
understanding them in more detail. I have long been working on finding
answers to these deep, underlying problems - after first identifying
some the major ones:
In message cagnrvupwf3n9jqmi_txwbxketo_59zdqqapcfcsyfduvqp8...@mail.gmail.com
Henning Rogge writes:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Curtis Villamizar
cur...@ipv6.occnc.com wrote:
In message 87a903ef2j.wl-...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
As to wireless links -- as
On 27.2.2015, at 23.37, Curtis Villamizar cur...@ipv6.occnc.com wrote:
Thanks for the response though. I use FreeBSD and other than rate and
S/N there isn't much, so could you send me sample output from a Linux
host or better yet a Linux AP with a few neighbors. We can take
this off list and
In message 54ee258e.8060...@gmail.com
Brian E Carpenter writes:
On 26/02/2015 05:14, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Ray Hunter wrote:
That way the devices can roam at L3, without all of the nasty side effects
of re-establishing TPC sessions, or updating
dynamic
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Curtis Villamizar
cur...@ipv6.occnc.com wrote:
In message 87a903ef2j.wl-...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
Thought: In general, my feeling is that L2 link status is widely relied
upon in commercial product/dpeloyments. If homenet
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Curtis Villamizar
cur...@ipv6.occnc.com wrote:
In message
cagnrvupwf3n9jqmi_txwbxketo_59zdqqapcfcsyfduvqp8...@mail.gmail.com
Henning Rogge writes:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Curtis Villamizar
cur...@ipv6.occnc.com wrote:
In message
One of the things I am testing is the new (so far pretty wonderful)
minstrel-blues patches for linux which couples rate control with
reducing power where it can, and adds a per station rc_stats_csv file
that can be easily parsed by external utilities. This gives you a
snapshot of the actual rate
I hereby request of the chairs of this working group that they cancel
any planned presentations at the upcoming meeting, and instead require
of the group that they actually bring in their own router from
anything off this list:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/
and there be, say, 5
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Curtis Villamizar
cur...@ipv6.occnc.com wrote:
In message 54ee258e.8060...@gmail.com
Brian E Carpenter writes:
On 26/02/2015 05:14, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Ray Hunter wrote:
That way the devices can roam at L3, without all of the
When performance in dual stack networks with multiple WiFi AP's in homes
suffers from homenet protocols, this WG produces dead protocols.
Why would homenet cause wifi APs to suffer more than they do today?
I think Teco was reacting to the suggestion that we perform wifi-wifi
bridging at a
Yep, intentionally so for now; of course, we could turn it even more in
the scalable (routing) protocol direction if there is desire.
That's not quite what I meant. I'll try to put it differently.
Right now, an HNCP node performs the following actions:
1. participate in Trickle-based
11 matches
Mail list logo
