Thanks Bernie, in any case for raising this. It is always good information
to process and think of carefully before bringing any conclusion.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:46 PM Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> Regarding RSOO, that’s fine if it doesn’t meet your needs. Just wanted to
> raise
Sounds good to me. Anyone objecting DIstribution Manager ? If not I will
consider this terminology.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 5:11 PM Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> Daniel Migault wrote:
> > "Distribution Primary" is probably my preferred alternative as the
> > replacement of
Daniel Migault wrote:
> "Distribution Primary" is probably my preferred alternative as the
> replacement of Master by Primary makes a smooth transition from what is
> currently used. If that is fine with everyone I will update the
> document with it as well as the DHCP option draf
Regarding RSOO, that’s fine if it doesn’t meet your needs. Just wanted to raise
it as it probably isn’t considered as often as it should be.
* Bernie
From: Daniel Migault
Date: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 1:11 PM
To: Michael Richardson
Cc: Ted Lemon , int-a...@ietf.org ,
dh...@ietf.org ,
Hi,
Thank you all for the feedbacks. I will perform the editorial once we have
settled the terminology.
Regarding the use of a DHCP Relay, we could of course make a use case of
it, but I believe it would go beyond the simplicity of the targeted
architecture and I would rather not consider this as
"Distribution Primary" is probably my preferred alternative as the
replacement of Master by Primary makes a smooth transition from what is
currently used. If that is fine with everyone I will update the document
with it as well as the DHCP option draft. If not feel free to provide a
better alternat
