* Juliusz Chroboczek
>> If there is a more complex HNCP network, then we could probably simulate
>> the L2 scenario with VXLAN, configured by HNCP.
>
> If memory serves, VXLAN requires support for multicast, which HNCP+Babel
> doesn't provide. There's a set of IBM (?) extensions to VXLAN that av
* Rich Brown
> (And I may take Tore up on his offer to push a feed of the newer
> packages to Github...)
I had some time to kill today, so here you go. Let me know if you find
it useful.
https://github.com/toreanderson/openwrt-feed
You're probably better off taking Markus's advice and staying w
* Rich Brown
> I'm new to this list, but have been using CeroWrt and OpenWrt for
> several years.
Welcome!
> Earlier in this thread there was a mention about hnetd being well
> integrated into the OpenWrt ecosystem. Before I try installing hnetd,
> I would like to know:
>
> 1) What are the curr
Hello,
* Tim Coote
> > Even if you're just testing plain babeld, even without hnetd, you
> > must kill network manager. If you don't, thinkgs may appear to
> > work at first, but NM will take revenge later.
> I hated NM. But I think that it’s getting better. It does provide an
> initial overa
* Steven Barth
> here is some attempt to formalize a simple WiFi roaming approach
> using host routes and a stateless proxy for DAD NDP messages.
>
> It's a bit theoretical right now but may be useful as a start for a
> discussion. We could do a talk on it in Yokohama as well.
Hi Steven and tha
* Dave Taht
> is it up from 8?
Depends. Am I one of the 8?
In any case, this might be of help to whoever wants to be #9:
http://blog.toreanderson.no/2015/10/11/making-a-homenet-router-out-of-openwrt.html
Tore
___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.o
Hi Steven,
* Steven Barth
> Am 05.09.2015 um 12:24 schrieb Tore Anderson:
> > What I am starting to suspect is that OpenWrt's «IPv6 ULA-Prefix»
> > setting is orthogonal to the Homenet handling of the interfaces, and
> > that in order to get the full/correct «Ho
* Juliusz Chroboczek
> > BTW - this reminded me that I also noticed that after rebooting a
> > router, another ULA prefix (*not* the one configured in OpenWrt on
> > either router) also showed up and links were numbered using it, but it
> > vanished again after a while. No idea where it came from.
* Markus Stenberg
> Instead, it sounds like potentially issue with IPv4 + dnsmasq (e.g.
> option that prevents RFC1918 replies from being forwarded), I hope
> you are not using legacy IP :)
I left everything at defaults, so my links were indeed numbered using
IPv4 (RFC1918, 10/8), as well as IPv
Hi,
Jumping in here with the perpective of a «dumb user» who spent the
weekend playing with the Homenet implementation in OpenWrt 15.05...
(Note that I don't know whether my comments pertain to the Homenet
standards themselves or are specific to the OpenWrt implementation.)
* Markus Stenberg
>
* Sander Steffann
> > Op 10 aug. 2015, om 10:23 heeft Erik Kline het
> > volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> Whilst not wanting to de-rail any effort to standardise Babel
> >> (since I firmly believe it should be standardised), I'd like to
> >> hear the WG's view on having part of our Homenet stack b
* Juliusz Chroboczek
> > After that you can also include the PIO with PL=VL=0 in the periodic
> > RAs (that you'll presumably be transmitting anyway)
>
> How many PIOs will fit? Is the 1280 octet minimal MTU the only
> limitation?
I don't think there's any practical limit, considering that you
* Steven Barth
> >If a new host is connecting to the network while you're advertising
> >the max(old valid lft, 2h) valid lifetime, it will actually
> >auto-configure itself with an address from the withdrawn prefix. If
> >you set valid lifetime to 0, it won't.
>
> Sounds good, i don't mind. Just
* Steven Barth
> In an ungraceful case (flash renumbering) we stop announcing the prefix in
> HNCP and the individual routers who have assigned it, MUST deprecate it
> according to RFC 7084 (not just stop announcing it in RAs). This deprecation
> sets preferred lifetime to 0 and valid lifetime to
* "Hemant Singh (shemant)"
> (c) An average home has one wifi link.
I think you'll find that an "average" home has more than 1 wifi link.
Maybe somewhere between 1 and 2 is the correct number.
For example: The concrete between the two floors in my apartment makes
an AP located upstairs practica
15 matches
Mail list logo
