* Sander Steffann <san...@steffann.nl>
> > Op 10 aug. 2015, om 10:23 heeft Erik Kline <e...@google.com> het
> > volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> Whilst not wanting to de-rail any effort to standardise Babel
> >> (since I firmly believe it should be standardised), I'd like to
> >> hear the WG's view on having part of our Homenet stack be on
> >> Experimental Track instead of PS. E.g., would it affect vendors'
> >> willingness to implement Homenet, etc?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Especially if that got us to a place where 2-3 years from now we
> > could publish {D,H}NCPbis incorporating lessons learned and whatnot
> > as a Proposed Standard, I think that would be a perfectly acceptable
> > outcome.
>
> +1
Indeed.
Experimental Track would at least mean being on *a* track, which is
more than could be said about the status quo, IMHO.
Tore
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
