Dear all,
Even if the Homenet WG will probably close in the coming months, I am adding a
third chair to the WG (planning for Barbara's departure from her active role)
and am happy to announce that Kiran Makhijani has accepted to take the position
of the 3rd chair. So, please welcome her ;-)
Hiya,
On 31/08/2021 15:53, Daniel Migault wrote:
I also support that homenet work being made in homenet. It is unclear to me
why we are looking at an alternate way to proceed.
From my POV, mostly because, as co-chair, it's very hard
to be confident that we have sufficient participation to
I also support that homenet work being made in homenet. It is unclear to me
why we are looking at an alternate way to proceed.
Yours,
Daniel
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 7:05 AM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Michael Richardson wrote:
> >> progress the stub networks draft because I've been too
> FWIW, I think there's further work after stub networks for HomeNet to do. We
> now have Babel and Source-Specific routing, but I suspect that setting it up
> will involve some innovation, and that ought to be documented.
That would be RFC 9080. It's fully implemented in both hnetd and shncpd.
FWIW, I think there's further work after stub networks for HomeNet to do.
We now have Babel and Source-Specific routing, but I suspect that setting
it up will involve some innovation, and that ought to be documented. And we
might be getting close to ready to talk about how to integrate the dnssd
Michael Richardson wrote:
>> progress the stub networks draft because I've been too busy doing
>> dnssd work, but that would be an example. I'd really like to progress
>> that draft /somewhere/, and it seems a /bit/ off-topic for dnssd. It
>> could go in v6ops, but it's pretty
Ted Lemon wrote:
> progress the stub networks draft because I've been too busy doing dnssd
> work, but that would be an example. I'd really like to progress that draft
> /somewhere/, and it seems a /bit/ off-topic for dnssd. It could go in
> v6ops, but it's pretty off-topic for
I think it's pretty clear that there's more work to do; the question is
whether the homenet working group has a quorum to do it. A fair amount of
the work we were trying to do in homenet has wound up happening in dnssd
instead, which seems fine—there was a pretty clear overlap there.
There is
Hiya,
On 24/08/2021 08:59, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
Dear all,
As you are probably aware, Barbara Stark is retiring from her WG
chair position after IETF-112
I'd also like to thank Barbara for all her fine work for this
WG, and everything else in IETF-land too!
and I now have ‘mission
Dear all,
As you are probably aware, Barbara Stark is retiring from her WG chair position
after IETF-112 and I now have ‘mission impossible n++’ to find a new WG chair
to assist Stephen Farrel.
As Stephen is an experimented WG chair, having a ‘junior’ co-chair would be
welcome (of course
10 matches
Mail list logo
