Re: [homenet] draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-01

2016-12-03 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> I do not like REQ5. As a SHOULD, perhaps, but MUST seems excessive. > Guest networks without any HNCP / routing traffic are the way to go > anyway in my opinion. What happens behind closed doors (= non-guest) is > up to the home, I think. Right. Plus there's the fact that nobody has stepped up

Re: [homenet] draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-01

2016-12-02 Thread Markus Stenberg
> On 2 Dec 2016, at 15.50, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > I've just submitted > > draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-01 > > It should hit the IETF repository soon, in the meantime, my working copy is on > > > https://github.com/jech/babel-drafts/tree/master/draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile > > T

[homenet] draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-01

2016-12-02 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Hi, I've just submitted draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-01 It should hit the IETF repository soon, in the meantime, my working copy is on https://github.com/jech/babel-drafts/tree/master/draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile The major change is the addition of Section 3, which describes how H