Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

FYI. Coller is on the 3rd floor in the hallway on the “other” side of the elevators. Barbara > On Jul 22, 2019, at 11:57 PM, STARK, BARBARA H wrote: > > *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***. > Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more informat

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

> I reserved the Coller room for Tuesday morning (08:30 - 10:00). It says it > holds up to 16 people. There are bigger rooms available (and additional > times, but I figured you meant before the first session since there's an > anima meeting Tuesday first session), but I thought this size might

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

On Jul 20, 2019, at 5:17 PM, RayH wrote: > One question on re-reading this version: why not populate the reserve zone > automatically from the data used to update the forward zone? That’s exactly what we’ve figured out in the Service Registration Protocol document. :)

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

On 20 Jul 2019 20:07, Ted Lemon wrote:On Jul 20, 2019, at 9:49 AM, RayH wrote:This (expired) draft?https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming-03Yes.We decided to get some implementation experience before proceeding, and it hasn’t popped to the top of the stack

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

On Jul 20, 2019, at 9:49 AM, RayH wrote: > This (expired) draft? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming-03 > Yes. We decided to get some implementation experience before proceeding, and it hasn’t popped

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

On 20 Jul 2019 13:04, Ted Lemon wrote:We have a design for local resolution in the homenet naming architecture doc.This (expired) draft?https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming-03Or have I missed something? I haven’t reviewed the latest front-end naming doc yet but presumably w

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

We have a design for local resolution in the homenet naming architecture doc.. I haven’t reviewed the latest front-end naming doc yet but presumably we can implement that and see what happens. :) Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 20, 2019, at 4:46 AM, RayH wrote: > > > If anybody is interested in

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

> If anybody is interested in building what I’m building, I can supply some pointers. Please. A working build chain would save a lot of effort. I'm on vacation now, but I should have some time when I get back.> Stuart and I have four AR750S routers between us. The challenge will be figuring out how

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

Stuart and I have four AR750S routers between us. The challenge will be figuring out how to get HNCPd to negotiate naming. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 19, 2019, at 7:15 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > STARK, BARBARA H wrote: >> If there are people interested in HNCP integration, I’m ha

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

STARK, BARBARA H wrote: > If there are people interested in HNCP integration, I’m happy to > reserve space for that (at a time different from the -naming effort), > and I’m happy to participate in that as well. I want to do HNCP integration at the hackathon, if we can. If it overflow

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

Ted Lemon wrote: > This is opposite a “Technology Deep Dive” talk that some folks might > want to go to. True. I think that it will be standing room only, and it will show up on Youtube. > I have an OpenWRT repo set up here that I’m using for the hacking I’m > doing, and that we

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

current OpenWRT. It really > needs updating, anyway. > Barbara > > > From: Ted Lemon > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 3:55 PM > To: STARK, BARBARA H > Cc: Michael Richardson ; homenet > Subject: Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting > > On Jul 15,

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

see about reflashing my router to the most current OpenWRT. It really needs updating, anyway. Barbara From: Ted Lemon Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 3:55 PM To: STARK, BARBARA H Cc: Michael Richardson ; homenet Subject: Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting On Jul 15, 2019, at 3:42

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

On Jul 15, 2019, at 3:42 PM, STARK, BARBARA H wrote: > I reserved the Coller room for Tuesday morning (08:30 - 10:00). It says it > holds up to 16 people. There are bigger rooms available (and additional > times, but I figured you meant before the first session since there's an > anima meeting

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

> > - I haven't scheduled > > an unstructured meeting. Should I? Should I do a quick Doodle poll for > > when? Or would people prefer to wing it when we get there? If we > > schedule something, I could set up a WebEx for remote people. > > I had suggested that it should be a *-nami

Re: [homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

STARK, BARBARA H wrote: > Hi homenet, Now that we're less than a week out... - What planning > should people do who can/will attend the hackathon? I intend to come, > and can bring a (LEDE load, currently) wireless router and other items > (Raspberry Pi ?). I will bring 2-3 devi

[homenet] final planning for not formally meeting

Hi homenet, Now that we're less than a week out... - What planning should people do who can/will attend the hackathon? I intend to come, and can bring a (LEDE load, currently) wireless router and other items (Raspberry Pi ?). If that would be useful. Does anyone else want to share their plans or