If Scott has done his own piano reduction from the full score, however,
he's not breaking copyright, is he?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hans Pizka
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 7:36 PM
To: The Horn List
Subject: Re: [Hornlist]
That would then make the 25+ foot hose be pitched in D basso? Whoo! I shudder
to think of navigating those close partials.
Herb Foster
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well if a D hose is 14 feet, than double that length would still be a D horn
That would make it 28 feet, and so 25 feet would be
Hahaha, nevertheless it'd be in D.
I suppose those would be for those 4th Hosaphone parts that were in Symphonie
Fantastique, but were later whited out when Berlioz realised they were just
too difficult to tune. Making a Hoseaphone sharp is easy. But, adding tubing to
make it flatter is hard.
John K wrote
As a piano tuner with more than twenty years
experience I can tell you that it is impossible to
tune a piano properly with a pair of scissors.
**
Not so fast, John. The scissors I buy at the
local store come from China, so they are tuned
to A = 445, instead of 440. But
Scott,
Don't be so hasty in withdrawing your own reduction. You may indeed be
able to offer your reduction without any problem.
First of all, according to US copyright law, anything published prior to
1923 is in the public domain (see
http://www.unc.edu/~unclng/public-d.htm). So if the score
Sorry, Amy, if Scott uses the scores available on the market (edited bz
Edmond Leloir - former KaWe or the other score from Musica Rara) instead of
any score from complete Haydn Works (I do not know it yet), he is breaching
the copyright law, as he is using copyrighted materal. If he travels to
6 matches
Mail list logo
