Hi,
Personally I'd prefer a single glossary within LearnOSM [1] which is
available in many languages. If you don't know what a term or acronym
means, you won't know where to search for it, hence my preference for a
single glossary. LearnOSM is linked from a number of sources which are
HOT rel
+1 for Susan's comments.
A multi-language GIS glossary (eventually) will be a real accomplishment
for OSM.
A few other thoughts you may have already considered:
I suggest maintaining either a LearnOSM glossary or the OSM wiki glossary,
but not both. One can point to the other. Or, the LearnOSM g
Hi althio and all,
As an organizer of information and a newbie, my opinion is to leave everything
in one list and not divide it. It should be alphabetic.
There is a lot to learn reading through a Glossary, and it’s always useful to
have everything in one place. It’s easy to find what you are
Hi all,
I am not sure how to handle the glossary mixture of:
- basic OSM terms
- basic HOT terms
- advanced HOT/Activation terms
I mean the growing glossary page could become overwhelming for a beginner.
What do you think?
All glossay in one continuous page? One page, sections by topics?
Differe
