I've been mapping and validating on Project 1800 but it doesn't make a lot
of sense.
The most difficult part to map is the built up areas with lots of very
close buildings which in some ways I'd expect a city in Japan to have its
own maps of buildings. Those tiles take time and lots of it. The bu
I would also note that it looks like we have some relatively new (8 total
OSM change sets) mappers playing the role of validator and invalidating
tasks for things beyond the requirement of the project (e.g. "incorrect
paths set" when the project [#1844] only called for buildings).
Mike
On Sat, Ma
I've sent something to the project manager maybe we'll hear something after
the weekend.
Cheerio John
On 7 May 2016 at 13:14, Mike Thompson wrote:
> I would also note that it looks like we have some relatively new (8 total
> OSM change sets) mappers playing the role of validator and invalidatin
Howdy, I would think that canada is going to need some work after this
blaze,
look at some of these sat photos there is not much left I think.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/36212516
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/fort-mcmurray-satellite-images
--
James Michael DuPont
Kansas Linux Fest http://kansa
Hi Mike
There are some folks talking on the OSM Talk ca mailing list about actions
and imagery. The governments are curious about digital volunteers and are
coordinating via a group called Canvost (a Canadian volunteer network).
I've connected them to talk-ca.
At the moment the fire is moving fas
There is also a TOMNOD campaign on at the moment that folks might like to help
with.
http://www.tomnod.com/
From: Heather Leson [mailto:heatherle...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 8 May 2016 3:27 PM
To: Mike Dupont
Cc: HOT@OSM (Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team)
Subject: Re: [HOT] fort mcmurry
