On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 11:33:24AM +, Donal Hunt wrote:
> I would agree with the view that such statuses should be managed outside of
> the OSM datastore. Organisations with interest of doing this may already be
> using products that rely on GIS data from various sources.
>
> For those
I would agree with the view that such statuses should be managed outside of
the OSM datastore. Organisations with interest of doing this may already be
using products that rely on GIS data from various sources.
For those designing apps, they can track things like damage, repairs, etc
and tie that
Just a quick note; HOT does not formally do damage tagging, mainly because no
tagging schema exists. In the past, members of HOT tried various tagging but
results for remote damage assessment were poor.
I personally would be glad to see a community driven tagging schema developed
but if not we
