On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:33 PM, hyan...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi hotties!
>
> Some of us are tracing polygons over tree areas, ones are using
> "landuse=forest" others "natural=wood" ¿which you consider more indicated?
> Mapping trees could be helpful for high level floods.
>
The project GeoBolivia
Hi,
the best way would have been to directly contact the mapper who has added 90%
of the forest around Ixiamas (me). I've used landuse=forest because the forest
around Ixiamas is harvested by three big companies. natural=wood I do only use
for forests which are almost completly not touched by h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Humberto:
About the forest vs. wood, it depends. Although there are 3 approaches
to which one to choose (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood#Notes ), it's
generally accepted to use the tag forest for areas covered mainly with
tr
There are multiple schemes used for natural=wood vs landuse=forest, so
either use is just as valid.
From: hyan...@gmail.com [mailto:hyan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 6:34 PM
To: HOT
Subject: [HOT] Bolivian Floods: "landuse=forest" or "natural=wood"?
://irc.oftc.net/#osm
Pierre
De : "hyan...@gmail.com"
À : HOT
Envoyé le : Dimanche 9 février 2014 21h33
Objet : [HOT] Bolivian Floods: "landuse=forest" or "natural=wood"?
Hi hotties!
Some of us are tracing polygons over tree a
Hi hotties!
Some of us are tracing polygons over tree areas, ones are using
"landuse=forest" others "natural=wood" ¿which you consider more indicated?
Mapping trees could be helpful for high level floods.
By the way, trying to give answer to question below, I'm wondering about
the best communicat
