Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

Hi, I'm not sure why you would want to use imagery that doesn't show a large percentage of buildings. The offset between the two images seems pretty small, and while undesirable, not that big of a problem. Dan On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Chad Blevins wrote: > I

Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

I modified the instructions in the task 2102 to hopefully help clarify the imagery problem. This it was originally mapped using Bing, I suggest we validate using that source and use the service for cloudy or poor image quality areas. I'm open to feedback of

Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

On 11/7/2016 6:17 AM, Chad Blevins wrote: Hi everyone, Thanks for the note, I created task 2102 and also provided the additional imagery service. Unfortunately certain areas of the custom image service are offset from Bing and existing OSM data. For this reason I purposely didn't load the

Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

Ooh, sorry to jump to conclusions. It looked like a straightforward problem at first glance. We've had similar challenges, where cloudy spots are mapped with different imagery. Not only was there considerable change on the ground, but also it was impossible to align the pictures because of the

Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

Hi everyone, Thanks for the note, I created task 2102 and also provided the additional imagery service. Unfortunately certain areas of the custom image service are offset from Bing and existing OSM data. For this reason I purposely didn't load the custom service into the task, but offered it in

Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

Hi Joost, Mike, Daniel, Joost is of course correct. In looking at the project in the TM, it is not clear which imagery should be preferred for mapping, it might be on purpose the other imagery is not in the imagery field. I sent an email via OSM to the project creator to see if we can clarify

Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

That shouldn't be necessary though. When you set up a task in the tasking manager, there is a tab to set the background imagery. Doing this ensures the custom imagery is loaded as default in ID. I don't know who managed the task, but they should be informed that this is a really useful thing to

Re: [HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

Daniel, * Right side of iD screen click the icon that looks like a stack of books / papers. * Click the magnifying glass next to "Custom" * Enter the string for the imagery source. Mike On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Daniel Specht wrote: > Hotties, > > I've been

[HOT] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Alternative imagery project 2102

Hotties, I've been reviewing some tiles on #2102 Suna East, Kenya - PMI/USAID . The instructions say to use tms[22]:http://imagegeocenter. org/image/rest/services/Kenyasunaeastv3/MapServer/tile/{z}/{y}/{x}, but when you go to the ID editor, the only available