Re: [hpx-users] Contributing to HPX

John, Currently I am not working on a project in which I could integrate HPX. I’ll think about that. It would be great if you got any ideas about small parts in HPX in which I could go on with, without going deeply in the HPX architecture. If you got any ideas please send it to me. Best, Ahme

Re: [hpx-users] Contributing to HPX

Ahmed, I would recommend to look at the issues for HPX. One first step could be to understand one of the issues and start to work on it. Best, Patrick On Thu, Oct 25, 2018, 3:55 AM Ahmed Samir wrote: > John, > > Currently I am not working on a project in which I could integrate HPX. > I’ll th

Re: [hpx-users] Contributing to HPX

Patrick, Great. Do you recommend a specific issue that I could start with? I took a look on the issues and found out that I need someone to direct me to some keys to start with any issue. So could you give me some pointers on an issue to get started? Best, Ahmed Samir Sent from Mail

Re: [hpx-users] Contributing to HPX

Hi Ahmed, One thing that you could work on is adding more (CDash) timing outputs to our benchmarks. John already started this with https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/pull/3421 and https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/issues/3422. I know this is not necessarily technically very challenging, b

Re: [hpx-users] Contributing to HPX

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:14 PM Biddiscombe, John A. wrote: > Ahmed > > I'm a little bit frightened by the idea of you working on hwloc+hpx - the > reason is the same as the one that caused problems in gsoc. > Something I have in mind, which would be a good fit with clear direction and specific

Re: [hpx-users] Contributing to HPX

> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:14 PM Biddiscombe, John A. > wrote: > Ahmed > > I'm a little bit frightened by the idea of you working on hwloc+hpx - the > reason is the same as the one that caused problems in gsoc. > > Something I have in mind, which would be a good fit wi