On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Jeff Pelkey wrote:
> I just moved up to IIS 5.0 on a Win2K machine and I am having problems
> running using H:T:Expr. I am currently running H:T v2.6 and H:T:E v.04.
> The code is the same except for adding "::Expr" then the code gives a
> "Cannot find server or DNS Error" me
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 07:42, Howard Kim wrote:
>Hello Cees,
>
>I know keepalive is on. How would I know if the server is in 'single
> process mode'? Where do I look for that -X switch? I'm working with
> one of our sysadmins for the server-side stuff. I'm really just a
> programmer
Howdy!
I just moved up to IIS 5.0 on a Win2K machine and I am having problems
running using H:T:Expr. I am currently running H:T v2.6 and H:T:E v.04.
The code is the same except for adding "::Expr" then the code gives a
"Cannot find server or DNS Error" message. I don't even use any of Expr's
fun
Hello Cees,
I know keepalive is on. How would I know if the server is in 'single
process mode'? Where do I look for that -X switch? I'm working with
one of our sysadmins for the server-side stuff. I'm really just a
programmer that plays a sysadmin on TV.
Thanks,
Howard
On Tuesday,
Sometime on Jan 21, Howard Kim assembled some asciibets to say:
>Thanks to everyone for the help and advice. I have determined that
> it is the server and not CGI::Template that is being slow. Now I just
Is it possible that you are running your development server in single process
mode (w
Sometime on Jan 21, Howard Kim assembled some asciibets to say:
>Thanks to everyone for the help and advice. I have determined that
> it is the server and not CGI::Template that is being slow. Now I just
^^^
huh?
Are you sure it's the
Hello All,
Thanks to everyone for the help and advice. I have determined that
it is the server and not CGI::Template that is being slow. Now I just
need to figure out why that is happening, but that is a new topic in
itself.
Regards,
Howard Kim
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 11:28
Hello,
I'm using ESCAPE="HTML" from inside some of my HTML::Templates to great
effect. However, I'm now at the point where I might want to use the
opposite, ESCAPE="UNESCAPE" or UNESCAPE="HTML". This comes from extracting
data from XML (which has obviously been escaped) and placing it into
HTML: