Hi,
I am trying to explain myself how the "keep-alive", or TCP connection
persistence, is supposed to work? I have read several resources about that,
but I still have some questions (
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/net/http-keepalive.html
http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/performance
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 14:51 +0300, Dobri Kitipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to explain myself how the "keep-alive", or TCP connection
> persistence, is supposed to work? I have read several resources about that,
> but I still have some questions (
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/net/
Hi Oleg,
thank you for the detailed answer of my question.
It seems we need to recommend the Axis2 guys to use the better version. Do
you know when there will be an official release of HttpClient 4.0-beta1?
Thank you,
Dobri
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Hi Oleg,
I have one additional more abstract question. What I have observed during my
tests was that when I run my test scenarion with 5 WS consecutive
invocations and sniff the traffic I can see that the sockets were reused.
The problem is that when I first tried to debug the source it always invo
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 17:27 +0300, Dobri Kitipov wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
> I have one additional more abstract question. What I have observed during my
> tests was that when I run my test scenarion with 5 WS consecutive
> invocations and sniff the traffic I can see that the sockets were reused.
> The pro
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 16:33 +0300, Dobri Kitipov wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
> thank you for the detailed answer of my question.
> It seems we need to recommend the Axis2 guys to use the better version. Do
> you know when there will be an official release of HttpClient 4.0-beta1?
>
> Thank you,
> Dobri
>
Thank you for the answers!
Regards, Dobri
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 17:27 +0300, Dobri Kitipov wrote:
> > Hi Oleg,
> > I have one additional more abstract question. What I have observed during
> my
> > tests was that when