[hugin-ptx] Re: Stiching fisheye images to a 360 degree image

Hi I'm also often having issues stitching fisheye pictures...and here with the sample pictures you give, indeed it's quite a mess, and some pictures get upside down...I just opened the pics, and specified to use a full frame fisheye, the 8mm and 1.59x are already there. Appart from that I've got a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stiching fisheye images to a 360 degree image

On Fri 23-Jan-2009 at 17:10 +0100, Lars Tore Gustavsen wrote: > >I'm consider buying a sigma 8mm F 3,5 to use with my canon 10D (1,6 >crop) for panoramic work.. Luckily enough I found some pictures from >almost the same combination online. Only differences are this lens is >the F4 version. I hear

[hugin-ptx] Re: Some help please with linux build from SVN

On Jan 24, 5:02 am, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Thu 22-Jan-2009 at 18:17 -0800, Tduell wrote: [snip] > panotools/hugin will by default install to /usr/local, this is good > because the official fedora stuff completely ignores anything in > /usr/local - If you mess things up just delete the entire

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 19:08, Daniel M German wrote: > very interesting ones. Do you have peirce quincuncials of any of them? > I'll be curious to see the result. Hhmmm - I will try. Right now, only a stereographic http://www.flickr.com/photos/sbprzd/533801817/ Cheers, Seb --~--~-~--

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

Seb> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 20:49, Dale Beams wrote: >> Actually i think there are some real challenges in projection by taking a >> photo at a very low point. Seb> Indeed ! Seb> see this tripodless attempt: Seb> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sbprzd/533695530/in/set-72057594100163739/

[hugin-ptx] Re: Some help please with linux build from SVN

On Thu 22-Jan-2009 at 18:17 -0800, Tduell wrote: > >I guess an alternate question would be, is there a smart way of doing >the build with a 'normal' installation that would not interfere with >hugin-0.7 that I already have installed? panotools/hugin will by default install to /usr/local, this is

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

On Fri 23-Jan-2009 at 11:22 -0500, Michael Galloway wrote: >On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 06:07:54PM +0200, Rich wrote: >> for me, the main benefit would be... to get me make more panos ;) >> currently i make some weak ones, then tuck them away in backups. >> if such an assignment would be started, that

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

I'd like to stick with 30 days. Partly because I think it pushes you for output rather than perfection. I've found some of my best panos were taken when I was doing 1 each day. They were not perfect, but rather I had to locate and find something interestingly enough to take. You can only ta

[hugin-ptx] Re: Some help please with linux build from SVN

It's a duplicate situation. However, I tend to really mess things up when trying various things out. As a result i build in a vm to isolate from my production system. This way when the *.deb or *.rpm is done i move them out to a web server and feel safe that no "extra" dependencies are nee

[hugin-ptx] Stiching fisheye images to a 360 degree image

Hello Sorry if this is a double post, but I think I used wrong address in the first one. I'm consider buying a sigma 8mm F 3,5 to use with my canon 10D (1,6 crop) for panoramic work.. Luckily enough I found some pictures from almost the same combination online. Only differences are this lens is

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 06:07:54PM +0200, Rich wrote: > > On 2009.01.21. 15:57, Michael Galloway wrote: > > good day all, some of us in the #hugin channel on freenode were kicking > > around the idea of > > having a monthly panorama assignment. just wondering how much interest > > there is and

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

On 2009.01.21. 15:57, Michael Galloway wrote: > good day all, some of us in the #hugin channel on freenode were kicking > around the idea of > having a monthly panorama assignment. just wondering how much interest there > is and there is > some web space around where we could post images. thi

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

Erik Krause wrote: > Dale Beams wrote: > >> Actually i think there are some real challenges in projection by taking >> a photo at a very low point. > > Not very low, but low: http://pano.erik-krause.de/beginning/#P2 (the > second one). And yes, it was a challenge... > I do apologise to all wh

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 20:49, Dale Beams wrote: > Actually i think there are some real challenges in projection by taking a > photo at a very low point. Indeed ! see this tripodless attempt: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sbprzd/533695530/in/set-72057594100163739/ Strangely enough, an attempt w

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

Dale Beams wrote: > Actually i think there are some real challenges in projection by taking > a photo at a very low point. Not very low, but low: http://pano.erik-krause.de/beginning/#P2 (the second one). And yes, it was a challenge... -- Erik Krause http://www.erik-krause.de --~--~-

[hugin-ptx] couple interestiong images

a couple of interesting pano's in this mornings web crawling: http://www.simonhoegsberg.com/we_are_all_gonna_die/slider.html http://gigapan.org/viewGigapanFullscreen.php?auth=033ef14483ee899496648c2b4b06233c http://www.davidbergman.net/blog/2009/01/22/how-i-made-a-1474-megapixel-photo-during-pres

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin on OpenSolaris/Solaris

Hi, On MacOSX when doing a straight cmake cross-compiling for another architecture I need to specify the openexr include directory as well and it works fine. so, the question is: How did you specify this ? If I would specify it on your solaris system I would use: "cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/us

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

Oh, I agree. You don't know how much I agree. :-) 2009/1/22 Tom Sharpless : > > Hi > > I pretty much agree with Yuv. If the purpose is to collect > exceptional images, there are more than enough places (and not enough > images) for that already. > > If the aim is to stimulate creative solution

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: > > I think that in this case it would be easier to take photos without > tripod. Moreover, my EOS 400D doesn't have live display function so > looking in view-finder which is 2 cm above the ground is almost > impossible. Chuckle. My humble Canon compact A630, with (as f

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin on OpenSolaris/Solaris

Hi again! Well, the problem is that cmake doesn`t recognise my OpenEXR installation. I installed it directly from IPS (it`s OpenSolaris repo tool, much like Debian`s apt), and these files residing at /usr/ include/OpenEXR. then this happens: teknika% pfexec cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/loca

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009 - ideas

2009/1/23 Yuval Levy : > > > > you are welcome to add your ideas to the list. what would you like to > see in hugin/panotools/enblend-enfuse/etc. > > Yuv > > > > I've already thought about that zones where different projections are used according whic

[hugin-ptx] Re: Some help please with linux build from SVN

2009/1/23 Tduell : > > Hullo All, > I thought I'd try building the latest hugin source from SVN (3585), > but wanted to keep the install a bit isolated until I have tested it. > I have ended up with it all installed in /home/terry/Hugin/SVNsrc/ > Hugin-build/usr/local/bin, .../lib64, .../share (wh

[hugin-ptx] Re: monthly assignment, any interest?

2009/1/22 Dale Beams : > Actually i think there are some real challenges in projection by taking a > photo at a very low point. More importantly I think I can take a panoramice > at ground level. the real trick will be to take one at that point and still > be able to remove the tripod from the p