[hugin-ptx] Re: strings/batcher

2009-02-16 Thread T. Modes
The strings for PTBatcher are also missing in hugin.pot. The cause could be, that PTBatcher is using the macro _T instead of _ as hugin. Maybe changing _T to _ in PTBatcher GUI (and in all involved source files) could solve the problem. Furthermore in the current implementation PTBatcher is alwa

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin Scripting?

2009-02-16 Thread rlhelinski
You're right about the indexing, judging from the result. It looks like this is happening even with SVN revision 949 of the scripts. On Feb 16, 2:15 pm, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Mon 16-Feb-2009 at 11:33 -0800, rlhelinski wrote: > > > > >Version 0.20 was giving me the same problem, but if I don'

[hugin-ptx] hugin and gcc-4.4

2009-02-16 Thread Bruno Postle
Hi, hugin-0.7.0 has a trivial build failure (missing #include's) with gcc-4.4. I don't have the resources to fix work on this now, could somebody who has access to 4.4 check and see if the hugin trunk fails as well? It would be nice to release 0.8.0 with this working. -- Bruno --~--~-

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin Scripting?

2009-02-16 Thread Bruno Postle
On Mon 16-Feb-2009 at 11:33 -0800, rlhelinski wrote: > >Version 0.20 was giving me the same problem, but if I don't start my >indexing from '0', but rather '1', it seems OK. The indexing should start from 0. Can you send me the .pto file that causes the problem? There was a recent bugfix in Pa

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin Scripting?

2009-02-16 Thread rlhelinski
Version 0.20 was giving me the same problem, but if I don't start my indexing from '0', but rather '1', it seems OK. On Feb 16, 12:27 pm, rlhelinski wrote: > This is precisely the thing I was looking for, however I have version > 0.19, and ptosplit is giving me: > Can't use an undefined value as

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin Scripting?

2009-02-16 Thread rlhelinski
This is precisely the thing I was looking for, however I have version 0.19, and ptosplit is giving me: Can't use an undefined value as a HASH reference at /usr/lib/perl5/ vendor_perl/5.10.0/Panotools/Script.pm line 480. I'm going to try to install 0.20 myself. On Feb 16, 11:49 am, Bruno Postle

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin Scripting?

2009-02-16 Thread Bruno Postle
On Mon 16-Feb-2009 at 07:35 -0800, rlhelinski wrote: > >I could write a script, but I would first need to know some kind of >command line that would take my Hugin .pto project, and call autopano- >sift-c but only connect two specific frames. Is this possible without >manipulating the project files

[hugin-ptx] Hugin Scripting?

2009-02-16 Thread rlhelinski
Hello all, I have a large number (8) of spherical views to process, each has 48 frames (HDR). I've noticed that part of what I'm doing would be amenable to a script. I could write a script, but I would first need to know some kind of command line that would take my Hugin .pto project, and call a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitching 128 pictures

2009-02-16 Thread Seb Perez-D
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 13:36, Maxxer wrote: > > using tiff worked but now I have... err... a 40G tiff! > any hope i'll see anything out of it? > or I better sort out another way? > > thanks again > maxxer Did you compress the TIFF ? this helps. The issue will remain that you have a very very la

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitching 128 pictures

2009-02-16 Thread Don Holeman
>> perhap on wiki or tutorials page would be good? Sure, but don't the new releases of hugin make manual HDR processing obsolete? I just put the raw instruction file on my web space, maybe you someone can take a look and tell me if it would be worth turning into a tutorial. http://holeman.org/W

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitching 128 pictures

2009-02-16 Thread Michael Galloway
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:00:43AM -0500, Don Holeman wrote: > > When I did my 3x6x8 HDR using hugin 0.6 I wrote up a protocol so I wouldn't > have to reinvent that wheel the for the next one. I will be happy to send > this to maxxer (or anyone), email me at don at holeman org. > > perhap on wi

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitching 128 pictures

2009-02-16 Thread Don Holeman
When I did my 3x6x8 HDR using hugin 0.6 I wrote up a protocol so I wouldn't have to reinvent that wheel the for the next one. I will be happy to send this to maxxer (or anyone), email me at don at holeman org. -Original Message- From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-...@googlegr

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitching 128 pictures

2009-02-16 Thread Don Holeman
Is it a multi-layered tiff? If so, use tiffsplit to break them apart. -Original Message- From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Maxxer Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 7:37 AM To: hugin and other free panoramic software Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: S

[hugin-ptx] Re: Stitching 128 pictures

2009-02-16 Thread Maxxer
using tiff worked but now I have... err... a 40G tiff! any hope i'll see anything out of it? or I better sort out another way? thanks again maxxer --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free