On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 23:57, Bart.van.Andel bavanan...@gmail.com wrote:
I just encountered an enblend error. At the end of a Hugin run, I get
this message:
---(1)---
enblend: an exception occured
Mask is entirely black, but white image was not identified as
redundant.
make: ***
Hi guys,
I also made my build available for the world. See
http://www.allardkatan.net/misc/hugin/index.html . I built an
installer from the 'package' in the SDK. I had to change a few minor
things in the CMAKELISTS.TXT file because it would name the program
and install directory Cmake, instead
Its time for updating its preview window. There must be standard features of
zooming in n out to know what we are going to get exactly. Secondly is there
any possibility that we get low res output files prior to time taking
stitching process. It will help us know and correct image without wasting
An other error !!! thist time with wxWidgets
http://apt.wxwidgets.org/dists/intrepid-wx/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
404 Not Found !!!
http://apt.wxwidgets.org/dists/intrepid-wx/main/source/Sources.gz 404
Not Found
On 17 fév, 20:53, Tim Nugent timnug...@gmail.com wrote:
did you install
On 18 Feb, 08:12, Emad ud din Butt xyzt...@gmail.com wrote:
Its time for updating its preview window. There must be standard features of
zooming in n out to know what we are going to get exactly.
I'm not a developer but I think that this feature isn't useful because
it will take a lot of
Okay I have to admit that the files I fed into Hugin were quite
different from normal panorama input. Instead of using pictures taken
from a single point, I moved the camera along the scene. This will
obviously make it more difficult to find a pleasing solution, but I
wasn't going for the
On 18 feb, 07:35, lxegs clement.batt...@gmail.com wrote:
i think i know 7zip and even if that's just an advice , the primary
purpose was to test that version and not speaking about possible
compression
do you give some advices on p2p/illegal sites when people don' t
compress with 7-zip ???
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 16:53, Bart.van.Andel bavanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay I have to admit that the files I fed into Hugin were quite
different from normal panorama input. Instead of using pictures taken
from a single point, I moved the camera along the scene. This will
obviously make it
Thanks, Bruno. This answers some next step questions that I had
because I am still opening Hugin (not that Hugin is bad!) to do some
very simple tasks:
* optimize all images except the anchor image for yaw, pitch and roll,
and allow view, barrel distortion, etc. to be corrected.
* delete any
On Wed 18-Feb-2009 at 09:28 -0800, allard wrote:
It just wasn't clear to me whether this situation is created
deliberately or it just wasn't a priority yet to create an
infrastructure that is more likely get more people involved.
There's no intentional policy, so far releases have happened
Hello,
The --fine-mask was a solution to a different problem, greyish rims in
stitched images.
Not resulting in an error, but faulty blending, can result when one of
the input photos has a hole. There one workaround is to resort to the
old seam placement at mid-distance of the overlap area. It
Bruno Postle schrieb:
Note that we don't expect Linux packagers to ask permission to
release snapshots, so there is no problem doing the same for
Windows, just please point people who don't want to participate in
testing to the 'stable' installer on sourceforge.
Slightly off-topic,
There isn't a Free Software yum/apt repo for
Windows, so we are obliged to put 'stable' installers in the
sourceforge download area.
I have no clue what a 'yum/apt repo' is but I guess I understand the
point.
Before the 0.7.0 release there were regular snapshot Windows
installers on
Guido Kohlmeyer a écrit :
Bruno Postle schrieb:
Note that we don't expect Linux packagers to ask permission to
release snapshots, so there is no problem doing the same for
Windows, just please point people who don't want to participate in
testing to the 'stable' installer on
Seb Perez-D a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:08, tennevin yves tennevin.y...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Compare this one (enfused) http://flickr.com/photos/styeb/3071381838/
to this one (hdr) http://flickr.com/photos/styeb/3070564323/
The exposures were -1 , 0 +1 EV
The result of the
I just found the REAL installer builder. The previous one was made by
using building 'PACKAGE' in VSC++, which works through CPack and NSIS.
While browsing the install directory I found the 'installer_howto.txt'
file written by Yuv. So I gave that a try. Worked after deleting some
references to
On Wed 18-Feb-2009 at 14:14 -0800, allard wrote:
Could you check http://www.allardkatan.net/misc/hugin/ and see if you
think this I've made it clear enough? If not I'll adapt it.
Looks good to me, thanks for working on this.
--
Bruno
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
==
TOPIC: Hugin Build Version 3649 for Windows
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/t/3df1d3642fb7d106?hl=en
==
== 1 of 7 ==
Date:
18 matches
Mail list logo
