2009/4/25 grow george...@gmail.com:
Lukas,
Thanks for the suggestion:
Have you tried running enblend with -m option?
I tried adding just -m and got a usage error that told me that the -m
option needed a number and that the default was 1024 ... so I tried
including:
-m 1024
in the
Milan Knížek píše v Po 02. 03. 2009 v 20:32 +0100:
I am experiencing a segmentation fault with the current SVN version of
hugin on Ubuntu 8.10 amd64 when running exposure optimisation (either
with wizard or manually).
Anyone else hit by the bug? I tried on Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty amd64 and
still
Thanks Lukas,
I have tried stitching an 8,000 x 4,000 equirectangular with
-m 1024
and with
-m 2048 (having quit every other application and cleared out
lots of RAM )
and each time the result is a crash that looks like the same old
error.
Next I am going to try -m 512
If anyone has
Am Samstag 25 April 2009 schrieb grow:
Thanks Lukas,
I have tried stitching an 8,000 x 4,000 equirectangular with
-m 1024
and with
-m 2048 (having quit every other application and cleared out
lots of RAM )
and each time the result is a crash that looks like the same old
error.
On Fri 24-Apr-2009 at 22:58 -0500, Dale Beams wrote:
svn: Failed to add directory
'hugin/src/hugin1/hugin/xrc/data/help_it_IT': object of the same
name already exists
Probably a missig .svn folder, delete the help_it_IT folder and try
again.
--
Bruno
In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
[...]
A question: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 was released seven weeks ago and
there have been no bug reports, can I assume that this version is ok
for a 'stable' release?
[...]
Simple stuff:
*man/*.1 still says .TH PANOINFO 1
On Sat 25-Apr-2009 at 18:39 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
A question: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 was released seven weeks ago and
there have been no bug reports, can I assume that this version is ok
for a 'stable' release?
*man/*.1
In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Sat 25-Apr-2009 at 18:39 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
tests/simpleTiff16/reference/ ships a .svn subdirectory.
This was fixed a couple of months ago, or at least the beta2 tarball
doesn't contain any .svn folders.
Aargh.
Hi!
I just tried the installer and noticed a possible issue. The installer
runs as administrator (which is correct) the issue is that the web
browser that shows the web site after the install also runs as
administrator. I'm not totally sure about it but I think that's what
happened to me.
//Ola
