On 2009.06.09. 20:38, rew wrote:
I shot a lot of panos the last vacation. I usuall tilt my camera 90
degrees left, and then shoot the images portrait mode, with about 50%
overlap.
Those images are stored as landscape jpgs, but with the exif-tag that
they are roted 270 degrees. When I view
OK, sorry for all the fuss. Cleaning out the destination directory
worked, I should have tried that first.
Lesson learned today: no more shortcuts.
Find the file at
http://hugin.panotools.org/testing/hugin/Hugin_08RC3_SVN3925_Allard_W32setup.exe
Allard
On Jun 9, 4:12 pm, allard
I've made a W32 installer as well, based on 3925. It's at
http://hugin.panotools.org/testing/hugin/Hugin_08RC3_SVN3925_Allard_W32setup.exe
.
BTW, Yuv, I still get the 'old version' warning after I run this
installer. The URL it redirects to is URL=http://www.photopla.net/
BTW, Yuv, I still get the 'old version' warning after I run this
installer. The URL it redirects to is URL=http://www.photopla.net/
hugin/dlcounter.php?svn=3925 . I didn't do any handwork on that.
Yo did everything right, Allard.
3925 is old compared with Ad's 3929. When I saw Ad's post:
Hi all
on the create mailing list [0] there is an open vote / consultation on
where to hold the next Libre Graphics Meeting. It would be good if
Hugin could be represented there. Bruxelles is the only proposition
that has reached a completeness stage and most other participating
projects are
Bruno Postle wrote:
I use categories are to indicate if the bug is platform specific
(Linux, OS X, Windows), and groups for the various tools, i.e. a
large number of entries in the hugin tracker are actually enblend or
autopano-sift-c bugs.
thanks for clearing up my confusion.
Although I'm not anything near sure what my next year will look like,
I vote in favor. It's practically feasible for me to go there by bike
^_^ at 169km...
Bart
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin
On Wed 10-Jun-2009 at 11:07 +0200, Yuval Levy wrote:
so how is a 'critical' bug different from a 'release blocker' bug?
It's the result of not maintaining the tracker very well.
can we make a list of what are 'release blockers' and focus on them?
for future releases I would like to have a
I vote in favor too.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Bart van Andel bavanan...@gmail.comwrote:
Although I'm not anything near sure what my next year will look like,
I vote in favor. It's practically feasible for me to go there by bike
^_^ at 169km...
Bart
--
Sébastien
On Wed 10-Jun-2009 at 02:01 -0700, Yuv wrote:
Should I reply to the thread saying that we as a community/project are
also in favor of Bruxelles? I am (although it is still too far in the
future for me to make travel plans).
Brussels is convenient for me, I would likely go.
--
Bruno
Bruno Postle wrote:
On Tue 09-Jun-2009 at 18:17 +0100, Doug wrote:
Here is stderror output towards the end, where the errors appear:
In file included from
/home/dougb/downloads/hugin-0.8.0/src/hugin1/hugin/GLPreviewFrame.cpp:47:
Yuv wrote:
Should I reply to the thread saying that we as a community/project are
also in favor of Bruxelles? I am (although it is still too far in the
future for me to make travel plans).
Yuv
I am in favor. I hope to have have something to present this time.
Jim Watters
this certainly does help, i'll try to have a look today.
once i get the project converted to jpg i'll send a link, also...
thanks!
On Jun 9, 2:00 pm, Bart van Andel bavanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Converting from a TIFF project to JPG is pretty easy. Just batch
convert all the tiffs to jpg (only
Hi all,
To give my (personal) viewpoint on these critical bugs on the OSX side:
2297456 Hugin crashes on exit after use OpenGL fast preview
windowhttp://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2297456group_id=77506atid=550441:
Still happens all the time after it has been used.
2189798 syslogd
I have no idea of my agenda either but I'm in favor too. Also for me it's
feasible.
Harry
2009/6/10 Jim Watters jwatt...@photocreations.ca
Yuv wrote:
Should I reply to the thread saying that we as a community/project are
also in favor of Bruxelles? I am (although it is still too far in
thanks everybody for the positive feedback. keep it coming. it has
been relayed on the CREATE mailing list.
is there also an interest to run another exhibit of artwork like
http://www.uwivi.com/ in Bruxelles?
Yuv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
hey all
On 10.06.2009, at 20:35, Yuv wrote:
is there also an interest to run another exhibit of artwork like
http://www.uwivi.com/ in Bruxelles?
i have absolutely no idea what i'll be doing next summer, so i cannot
comment on bruxelles per se, but i would very much vote for having
another
2009/6/10 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com
2009/6/10 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com:
1898264 autopano-sift-c failure with Hugin.app (OS X). Should be closed.
This must be a configuration error. Stupid OSX holds a special path in
a
special file for external binaries called
i took a look at all three ring images in this project as well as a
few that are 'missing' (in the black areas) in the problematic pano.
the masks appear to be pixel perfect in line with the remapped image.
when you mention opening up the ring masks above, are you referring to
increasing the
I think it will an interesting exercise to run them through PTmasker
and PTroller to see if the mask computation works better. This might
help create a patch for enblend.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:54 AM,
slatersoncampbell.christop...@gmail.com wrote:
i took a look at all three ring images in
3925 is old compared with Ad's 3929. When I saw Ad's post:
OK, I get it. But it must be confusing for less informed users when
they install 3925 (pretty bleeding edge) and get a page that basically
tells them to install 0.7 (it may be the current stable release but
it's ancient) or look for
21 matches
Mail list logo
