Terry -
On Dec 4, 11:07 pm, Tduell wrote:
> This version builds without error on Fedora 11 x86_64 and a few quick
> tests with some old projects don't reveal and problems.
Thanks for checking it out!
> There are lots of compiler warnings during the build about array
> bounds being exce
gah
I have an ability to miss the obvious. In the mean time, I found
Flexify by Flaming Pear and it worked incredibly well.
It actually worked a little better then Hugin did, but that could have
just been an issue with that picture in the first place.
When you "guys" (I get the impression theres a
On Dec 4, 2:06 pm, Ben Page wrote:
> I have used Hugin to create an equirectangular panorama, but I am not
> sure how to convert it to a stereographic projection.
> Looking
> athttp://www.flickr.com/photos/jftphotography/505537834/in/set-72157600...
> I see no option to adjust pitch and am unsure
I have used Hugin to create an equirectangular panorama, but I am not
sure how to convert it to a stereographic projection.
Looking at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jftphotography/505537834/in/set-72157600233861994/
I see no option to adjust pitch and am unsure of what to do next.
I am running Mac
On Dec 2, 1:18 am, Heliooos wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am using Hugin for a short time and discovering its features step by
> step. I found some tutorials how to create 360 degrees panoramas in
> stereographic projection which look like a planet. They use o
> equirectangular panoramas made with fisheye
Hullo Chris,
On Dec 4, 6:00 pm, cspiel wrote:
> Hello Everybody!
>
> Today we announce the third release
> candidate (RC3) for Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0.
> We have put a tar-ball of it at
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/enblend/files/
[snip]
This version builds without error
Hi Alex,
My internet connection has (finally) been restored. You can download a
static standalone align_image_stack binary from my website. Either take the
one from the "generate tools" package or from the
"enblend/enfuse/align_image_stack" package.
Harry
2009/12/2 otheralex
> Harry,
> Thank
You "should" use a tripod, but hugin can help when you can't.
As for the number of images, the bare minimum is that you need more bits
than the output.
In short, this means that you will output a LDR in the end, which is
typically 8 bit. So you need more than 8 as an input. Some cameras now take
2 small details to add.
Finding control points can be 100% done command line. Look for the software
panomatic (not part of hugin). It can do the job extremely well.
Second, a HDR will always look washed out until you process it back to an
LDR. That process is called tonemapping. You can use some
> 1) loaded two images, taken right after the other with only exposure
> changed
I thought that for HDR you need 3 images - "over-exposed" "normal"
exposure and "under-exposed" - in best way made in auto exposure
bracketing (AEB) which automatically creates 3 shots with different
exposures for HDR
10 matches
Mail list logo
