Hullo Chris,
On Feb 7, 12:18 pm, Wolfgang Lin wrote:
> For those satellite image, the way to map them should not be simply Hugin.
[snip]
> However, I don't know if we have any affordable Software for personal
> interest...
If you are really trying to stitch together satellite imagery for
mappin
For those satellite image, the way to map them should not be simply Hugin.
If Hugin works, your Photoshop may even be better.
I used to use photogrammetry software to do that because we have to identify
pixels on the images to map with real map coordinate to locate the image's
location and define t
Hello,
If you post your project and pictures to the files area, others could
try and see what happens. Could you post some details such as what
operating system you are using and lens details?
Best regards,
Gerry
On Feb 6, 2010, at 5:01 PM, pwinter wrote:
Hello, Perhaps someone her
Hello, Perhaps someone here can help me. I have tried many times to
use Hugin .7 and simply couldn't make it work, so I uninstalled that
and installed 4.0 on a Vista machine. That was no better. No matter
what I do, the preview image is square and almost totally black, as is
the finished, saved
Hello Jeffrey,
It seems you may have a separate lens assigned to each image. If you hop
back over to the Camera Lens tab:
1. select all images
2. click the change lens button
3. set all images to the same lens (probably 0 if you only have one)
That should reduce the number of entries i
i'm quite frustrated because the optimizer in hugin is showing a
checkbox for EACH IMAGE for the lens parameters. see this screenshot:
www.vrlog.net/temp/hugin-optimize.jpg
how can I change it so that there is only ONE checkbox for lens
parameters?
thanks :)
jeffrey
--
You received this message
I have tried align_image_stack, but I am not getting good results on
test images that my original script works very well on. The satellite
images do contain some of the same area, but they are from slightly
different viewpoints. Thus, I think the assumptions of
align_image_stack (images are slightl
On Feb 6, 12:21 pm, Ricky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been trying my hand at making cubic panoramas using Hugin and
> wanted to know how many pictures would make for an optimum number to
> be stitched together. All tutorials I could find on the web advocated
> the use of a fish-eye lens which I d
Thanks for the suggestions. I will try playing around with various
real numbers for the hfov for autooptimiser, and also give the
align_image_stack script a try. I have never used that script, so I
will see where I can get. I will report back.
Thanks!
Chris
On Feb 6, 1:46 am, Martin Proetzsch wr
Ricky kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai, 6. helmikuuta
2010):
> I have been trying my hand at making cubic panoramas using
> Hugin and wanted to know how many pictures would make for an
> optimum number to be stitched together.
That depends entirely on the field of view of the lens/cam
Hi all,
I have been trying my hand at making cubic panoramas using Hugin and
wanted to know how many pictures would make for an optimum number to
be stitched together. All tutorials I could find on the web advocated
the use of a fish-eye lens which I don't have. Are there any other
alternatives or
11 matches
Mail list logo
