On Apr 13, 2:36 pm, Tom Sharpless wrote:
> Dragging the preview is also the right way to make the horizon exactly
> straight, or vertical lines exactly vertical, which is the same
> thing. I believe there is a lot of confusion about this, due to the
> historical existence of 'horizontal' and '
Hi
Control points are for aligning the component photos to each other,
not for aligning the panorama to the viewing frame.
The right way to rotate a pano is just to drag it around in the
preview window (right mouse button; in slow preview the cursor point
jumps to the horizon; in fast preview you
I think we (libpano) should rename that function to make it clear that
it belongs to libpano: panoQueryFOVLimits
--dmg
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Mon 12-Apr-2010 at 15:24 -0700, hans wrote:
>
>> I am trying to build hugin on SUSE 11.2 with this script
>
>> Linking
On Mon 12-Apr-2010 at 15:24 -0700, hans wrote:
I am trying to build hugin on SUSE 11.2 with this script
Linking CXX executable celeste_standalone
../hugin_base/libhuginbase.so.0.0: undefined reference to
`queryFOVLimits'
Either you don't have the current libpano13 trunk installed, or you
h
Hi,
I am trying to build hugin on SUSE 11.2 with this script
#
#git clone git://repo.or.cz/liblqr.git
cd /usr/src/liblqr
make distclean
git pull
./configure
#make clean
make
make install
#
mkdir -p /usr/src/enblend
cd /usr/src
cvs -d:pserver:anonym...@enblend.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/enblend
l
On 12 Apr, 09:15, David Spencer
wrote:
> On Apr 11, 4:15 pm, Peter Chant wrote:
>
> > Can anyone give me a hint of what is going wrong here? Untarring
> > enfuse / enblend 4.0 and running / configure does not cause any
> > complains. However, on running make I get the output below. Perhaps
>
>
> http://enblend.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/enblend/enblend/diff/9d9b5f3a...
>
> Maybe, you'd like to try it out.
Downloaded via mercurial. Built fine. There were lots of warnings
about depreciated functions - but it works.
Thank you.
Much appreciated.
Pete
--
You received this me
2010/4/12 Martin Lukeš :
>
> Now I'd like to know if there is a way how to rotate picture at
> Control Points tab.
Hugin displays your photos the right way as best as it can. Initially
it uses the EXIF metadata, but once you start aligning it uses the
rotation of the photos in the panorama.
If y
Yes it depends on the control points, I sometimes get even an upside
panorama.
That´s what usually works for me:
Go to the PICTURES-Tab, select your anchor position picture, below in
"Image Orientation" click "RESET" (the roll value should look rather
weird), then "Optimize Positions".
--
You rec
IANAD == I am not a developer
To my knowledge, no. This has been a long standing problem. It's not really
due to rotation as I understand it, but rather on control points that are not
matched properly (according to the developers). Why this has been such a
problem, I'm not sure.
Autosti
Now I'd like to know if there is a way how to rotate picture at
Control Points tab.
It sometimes "mysteriously" rotate and I'd like to rotate it back.
If there isn't such feature yet, do you plan it for future releases?
I believe the orientation of the image directly depends on the roll
p
Hi,
On 7 April 2010 21:09, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>
> "Error: no overlapping points found. Photometric optimization aborted"
>
> Any ideas what to do? There was no difficulty adding control points (the
> horizon is plenty "interesting")
I do see the same error with my relatively recent (about 2 wee
Hi all
First I'd like to thank developers for such a great program as Hugin
is. Thank you!
Now I'd like to know if there is a way how to rotate picture at
Control Points tab.
It sometimes "mysteriously" rotate and I'd like to rotate it back.
If there isn't such feature yet, do you plan it for fut
2010/4/10 Bruno Postle
> It is probably ok as is, but I'm not sure if it needs the option to switch
> modes. My understanding is that rotating the scene makes no sense when
> there are XYZ offsets, similarly XY translation makes no sense when there
> are no XY offsets. I think I need to do some
David -
On Apr 12, 10:15 am, David Spencer
wrote:
> A number of deprecated libpng functions have been removed in libpng
> 1.4, including the function implicated here, png_set_gray_1_2_4_to_8.
> The following fairly trivial patch fixes it by using the replacement
> function png_set_expand_gray_1_2
On Apr 11, 4:15 pm, Peter Chant wrote:
> Can anyone give me a hint of what is going wrong here? Untarring
> enfuse / enblend 4.0 and running / configure does not cause any
> complains. However, on running make I get the output below. Perhaps
> it is a missing dependency but I can't see what it
16 matches
Mail list logo
