On Oct 11, 3:32 pm, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Sun 10-Oct-2010 at 18:55 -0700, redag2 wrote:
>
> >No precompiled Win32 release?
>
> Sorry, we have never yet managed to synchronise binary and source
> releases.
>
> Hopefully there will be Windows and OS X installers in the
> Sourceforge download sy
On Oct 11, 5:00 pm, Matthew Petroff wrote:
> On Oct 11, 6:32 pm, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> > Hopefully there will be Windows and OS X installers in the
> > Sourceforge download system sooner or later.
>
> I have completed release builds for both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows.
> Yuv offered me commit
Am Dienstag, 12. Oktober 2010 schrieb Florian Achleitner:
> Hi!
>
> On Mo, 2010-10-11 at 18:06 -0500, Dale Beams wrote:
> > Begin by
> >
> > "dpkg -p enblend"
> >
> > Purge your old hugin installation first.
> >
> > Dale
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:48:01 -0700
On 13.10.2010 01:27, Bruno Postle wrote:
Most of my control points are concentrating to the lower middle of an
image which is not enough to control a fisheye panorama.
If you use the autopano-sift-c '--maxmatches %p %o %s' parameters
then Hugin supplies all lens parameters to the tool.
i.e. w
On Tue 12-Oct-2010 at 19:59 +0200, Bernd Hohmann wrote:
On 12.10.2010 18:07, Dale Beams wrote:
Pablo's CPFind (or whatever it's currently called) works well. I've got
mixed signals from devs. Not sure if it's in the current hugin branch
or if it still needs to be built separately.
It isn't
On Mon 11-Oct-2010 at 22:21 +0200, Bernd Hohmann wrote:
is there any switch to force autopano-sift-c to create a buch broader
distriubution of the control points?
Most of my control points are concentrating to the lower middle of an
image which is not enough to control a fisheye panorama.
Hoy Harry
On 10.10.2010, at 13:52, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I built another triple architecture i386/x86_64/ppc bundle.
> In this bundle the GSOC-2010 makefile project and the GSOC-2010
> patent_free_cpm project are integrated.
> It took some time to integrate these two also due
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ehsan Esbati:
> > This is my cmake output:
> ...
>
> > the only difference is HG revision and the second line of your output
> > is also missing from mine (ChangeLog bit).
>
> Mysterious.
>
> The created pack
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ehsan Esbati:
> This is my cmake output:
>
...
>
> the only difference is HG revision and the second line of your output
> is also missing from mine (ChangeLog bit).
>
Mysterious.
The created package is 44MB, so I was unable to send it with e-mail.
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 10:19 -0700, Mateusz wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Thanks for the fix, but I still don't understand:
> How 3x 4288x2488 pixel images end up with 960 giga pixels which is 960
> 000 000 000 pixels image.
>
> For me making a square from those 3 images: 3x width and 3x height =
> 12864
This is my cmake output:
-- Current HG revision is 294c413a5883
-- Found wxWidgets: TRUE
-- Found TIFF: /usr/include
-- Found JPEG: /usr/include
-- Found PNG: /usr/include
-- WARNING: you are using the obsolete 'PKGCONFIG' macro use
FindPkgConfig
-- Found OPENEXR: /usr/lib/libImath.so;/usr/lib/lib
On 12.10.2010 18:07, Dale Beams wrote:
Pablo's CPFind (or whatever it's currently called) works well. I've got
mixed signals from devs. Not sure if it's in the current hugin branch
or if it still needs to be built separately.
It isn't in the 2.0 release branch, neither I found the sources fo
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ehsan Esbati:
> The packages from Kornel installs without any problem so I went ahead
> and built hugin from source but get the same error when I try to
> install it. :(
This are the parameter you may fed into cmake for hugin:
#cd {build-dir}
#cmake {source-di
Hi James,
Thanks for the fix, but I still don't understand:
How 3x 4288x2488 pixel images end up with 960 giga pixels which is 960
000 000 000 pixels image.
For me making a square from those 3 images: 3x width and 3x height =
12864x7464 = 96 016 896 pixels.
Aligning them should not take more spac
The packages from Kornel installs without any problem so I went ahead
and built hugin from source but get the same error when I try to
install it. :(
(Reading database ... 179517 files and directories currently
installed.)
Preparing to replace hugin 2010.0.0+dfsg-3ubuntu1 (using
hugin-2010.3.0-Lin
Dale Beams schrieb am 12.10.10 18:07:
Pablo's CPFind (or whatever it's currently called) works well. I've got
mixed signals from devs. Not sure if it's in the current hugin branch
or if it still needs to be built separately.
cpfind is already in Harry's 2010.3.0 build for Mac. If it's not alr
I have 8 image around and a fisheye for the Zenith.
cpfind hardly finds any controlpoints at all, while autopano-sift-c finds
lots between the 8 images and some to the fisheye.
Suggestions?
Jan
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Dale Beams wrote:
> Pablo's CPFind (or whatever it's currently ca
Pablo's CPFind (or whatever it's currently called) works well. I've got
mixed signals from devs. Not sure if it's in the current hugin branch
or if it still needs to be built separately.
If you want a Patent free ACPD I'd suggest using it, or building it from
source. I've been using it exclusiv
On 12.10.2010 17:48, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
as far as i can tell, autopano-sift-c is too slow, too inaccurate, and
no one wants to work on it because some barbarians decided it was a
good idea to patent it.
Beside the patent issue: if a new controlpoint generator would need 6
hours to create so
as far as i can tell, autopano-sift-c is too slow, too inaccurate, and
no one wants to work on it because some barbarians decided it was a
good idea to patent it.
so my advice would be to wait for something better to come along :-)
probably very soon :-)
On Oct 11, 10:21 pm, Bernd Hohmann wr
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:51 -0700, Mateusz wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I haven't seen change yet, but can the warning (or maybe it already
> does) contain predicted output size and information what to do if this
> is not intentional ?
The warning is of this form:
Are you sure you want to stitc
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ehsan Esbati:
> Yup, 64 bit. That would be very nice of you. Can you see my email?
>
Ok, sent privately.
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Yup, 64 bit. That would be very nice of you. Can you see my email?
On Oct 12, 2:48 pm, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ehsan Esbati:
>
> > Maybe I should have problem installing enblend in the title but as I
> > said libpano threw up the exact same error so it's not sill
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ehsan Esbati:
> Maybe I should have problem installing enblend in the title but as I
> said libpano threw up the exact same error so it's not silly to think
> hugin would have had the same problem.
Is your ubuntu 64-bit? If yes, I could provide the .deb's for li
Maybe I should have problem installing enblend in the title but as I
said libpano threw up the exact same error so it's not silly to think
hugin would have had the same problem.
On Oct 12, 2:11 pm, Ehsan Esbati wrote:
> Via cmake.
>
> The error massage I posted above is after I had installed the
Via cmake.
The error massage I posted above is after I had installed the
repository builds so this particular message is not from a purged
system but the message from when I had no traces of hugin, enblend,
etc., was essentially the same.
On Oct 12, 1:20 pm, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag 12
Am Dienstag 12 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ehsan Esbati:
> Yeah, as I said this is a fresh install of Ubuntu with no trace of any
> previous hugin installations...
Please try to be a bit more exact. From your mail it seems you have problem
installing enblend (_not_ hugin).
That said, I also have here u
Yeah. I started off with no hugin installed and the end result was the
same. I then installed the version from the repository and tried to
upgrade that. The error message in the original post is from that
second test. The original massage was of the same nature though...that
it can't create things
Yeah, as I said this is a fresh install of Ubuntu with no trace of any
previous hugin installations...
On Oct 12, 8:07 am, Florian Achleitner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mo, 2010-10-11 at 18:06 -0500, Dale Beams wrote:
>
>
>
> > Begin by
>
> > "dpkg -p enblend"
>
> > Purge your old hugin installation fir
Hi James,
I haven't seen change yet, but can the warning (or maybe it already
does) contain predicted output size and information what to do if this
is not intentional ?
For example: Warning output canvas size is 98x98 if this is
not Your intention, use Sticher tab and set a different outp
Hi!
On Mo, 2010-10-11 at 18:06 -0500, Dale Beams wrote:
> Begin by
>
> "dpkg -p enblend"
>
> Purge your old hugin installation first.
>
> Dale
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:48:01 -0700
> > Subject: [hugin-ptx] Problem with installing hugin
> > From: sennai...@gmail.com
> > To
31 matches
Mail list logo
