[hugin-ptx] THANK YOU

2010-11-28 Thread Yuval Levy
To all those who built binaries from the released source tarball, and those who are still building them: a big THANK YOU! You achieved a first: this is the first release of Hugin ever that got binary support for so many platforms in such a short time - less than 48 hours. I hope ordinary user

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

2010-11-28 Thread Yuval Levy
On November 28, 2010 06:30:48 pm Yuval Levy wrote: > An Ubuntu binary package of Hugin is available for Lucid (10.4) in my PPA > [0]. If somebody can verify it is correct, I'll transfer it to the > official Hugin PPA. > > I'll look into a Jaunty (9.10) version after dinner. got my alphabet wrong,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

2010-11-28 Thread michael crane
> I'll look into a Jaunty (9.10) version after dinner. " hey lady if you don't know what "diddy wah diddy" [0]means , don't mess with it" > [0] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYaWTCY0Tns > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free pano

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: open source close range photogrammetry

2010-11-28 Thread Chris Erskine
that insight3d looks amazing. I'm going to have a look at this. On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Gerhard Killesreiter < gerh...@killesreiter.de> wrote: > > > On 27 Nov., 03:24, luca vascon wrote: > > http://insight3d.sourceforge.net/ > > > > I would invite this guy to join us!!! > > > > Where c

Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: [hugin-ptx] 2010.4

2010-11-28 Thread john doe
ok, spanish po then is there anything else i need to add to the file??im using regular text editor.. On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sat 27-Nov-2010 at 21:13 -0430, john doe wrote: > >> hey guys i began the spanish translation, what should i call the file? >> >> es_VE??

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

2010-11-28 Thread Yuval Levy
On November 27, 2010 11:37:09 am Andreas Metzler wrote: > Yuval Levy wrote: > > On November 27, 2010 10:19:39 am Andreas Metzler wrote: > [...] > > >> PS: I intend to upload 2010.4.0 beta1 to debian/experimental tomorrow. > >> Works-for-me packaging is already in git > >> git://git.debian.org/git

Re: [hugin-ptx] [OSX] 2010.4.0-beta1 bundle available (Was: ANN: Hugin-2010.4.0beta1 source tarball released)

2010-11-28 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sun 28-Nov-2010 at 18:57 +0100, Harry van der Wolf wrote: You can find a hugin 2010.4.0-beta1 mac bundle on my pages [0]. Changelog for the 2010.4.0-beta1 version bundle: same as for the source tarball, see Yuval's mail below. Since we are all announcing 2010.4.0_beta1 binary releases, the

Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: [hugin-ptx] 2010.4

2010-11-28 Thread Bruno Postle
On Sat 27-Nov-2010 at 21:13 -0430, john doe wrote: hey guys i began the spanish translation, what should i call the file? es_VE?? Call it es.po if you want to update the translation for all Spanish speaking users. If you call it es_VE.po then it will only be available to Venezuelan users.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's the difference between the trunk and the 2010.4 translations?

2010-11-28 Thread Yuval Levy
Hoi Harry, On November 28, 2010 04:03:16 pm Harry van der Wolf wrote: > I'm very sorry. I had not synced my trunk after downloading the 2010.4 > branch. Very stupid mistake. Don't worry, it has no consequences and it happens to almost everybody at some point. Look at the merge operations in the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's the difference between the trunk and the 2010.4 translations?

2010-11-28 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi Yuv, 2010/11/28 Yuval Levy > On November 28, 2010 08:16:09 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > > As I need to do some updating of the dutch translations I was was > > > wondering what the difference is between the 2010.4.0 .po files and the > > > trunk .po files. > > > The 2010.4 files are bigge

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-noop and other repo cruft

2010-11-28 Thread Yuval Levy
On November 27, 2010 07:14:00 pm Kornel Benko wrote: > I propose to drop the /usr/lib/libGL.so.1-dependency. is there any disadvantage doing so? while we are at it, the Debian packages drops a couple of other dependencies. Should we drop them too? see attached patch. > I even don't understand

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: What's the difference between the trunk and the 2010.4 translations?

2010-11-28 Thread Yuval Levy
On November 28, 2010 08:16:09 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > As I need to do some updating of the dutch translations I was was > > wondering what the difference is between the 2010.4.0 .po files and the > > trunk .po files. > > The 2010.4 files are bigger than the trunk files. > > - Why? hg pull

[hugin-ptx] [OSX] 2010.4.0-beta1 bundle available (Was: ANN: Hugin-2010.4.0beta1 source tarball released)

2010-11-28 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi mac users, You can find a hugin 2010.4.0-beta1 mac bundle on my pages [0]. Changelog for the 2010.4.0-beta1 version bundle: same as for the source tarball, see Yuval's mail below. Changelog for the dmg: - New webloc shortcut document for "Hugin Bugtracker": now points to the new launchpad trac

[hugin-ptx] Re: What's the difference between the trunk and the 2010.4 translations?

2010-11-28 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi, 2010/11/28 Harry van der Wolf > Hi, > > 2 questions. > > As I need to do some updating of the dutch translations I was was wondering > what the difference is between the 2010.4.0 .po files and the trunk .po > files. > The 2010.4 files are bigger than the trunk files. > - Why? > > I should ha

[hugin-ptx] What's the difference between the trunk and the 2010.4 translations?

2010-11-28 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Hi, 2 questions. As I need to do some updating of the dutch translations I was was wondering what the difference is between the 2010.4.0 .po files and the trunk .po files. The 2010.4 files are bigger than the trunk files. - Why? I prefer to do the translations once with some small rework, and no