Hullo Kay,
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:51:08 +1000, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 29 Jul., 01:00, "Terry Duell" wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:31:08 +1000, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --fullscale --sieve2size 5 -o %o %s
Adding the above options resulted in only 7 control points, versus 15
Hello Yuv
The thread in the hugin ptx was from september last year with hugin
2010.2 RC1.
There I asked it if that behavior was normal. And with the definitive
version it was gone. At that moment I had no subscription to the
bugtracker and so no bug filed.
The number I filed in the bugtracker is 8
kfj wrote:
On 29 Jul., 11:25, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
You may want to take a look at rawtherapee 3.x. It can do a very good
job at restoring the highligths. I was able to get this [1] while the
in camera jpeg looks like this [2] using the method described at [3].
It still has some ugly magenta
Yuval Levy wrote:
On July 27, 2011 10:59:03 AM Tom Sharpless wrote:
Agree with Nomad that metadata copying should be customisable, and
with Markku, that it should be done within the hugin tools, in a way
that supports hugin functions first.
+1
However both of those sound to me like big proje
-- Forwarded message --
From: T. Modes
Date: Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:00 AM
Subject: Re: calibrate_lens
To: Thomas Sharpless
Hi Tom,
Am 27.07.2011 18:14, schrieb Thomas Sharpless:
> Hi Thomas
>
> Having finally got set up to build Hugin again, I have tried your
> calibrate_lens g
On 29.07.2011, at 15:11, kfj wrote:
> On 29 Jul., 14:25, David Haberthür wrote:
>
>> And on a lighter note, Hugin doesn't seem to be too bad, a friend of mine
>> had great results with it: http://permanenttourist.ch/?p=8669
>
> ... as I say, if it does what it's supposed to do, it does it wel
On 29 Jul., 14:25, David Haberthür wrote:
> And on a lighter note, Hugin doesn't seem to be too bad, a friend of mine had
> great results with it: http://permanenttourist.ch/?p=8669
... as I say, if it does what it's supposed to do, it does it well.
Lovely image! Sort of what you spend three
Ciao.
On 29.07.2011, at 03:18, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On July 28, 2011 10:08:25 AM Yuval Levy wrote:
>> On July 28, 2011 01:44:03 AM Terry Duell wrote:
>>> This is what happened here with Opera 11.50.
>>
>> I will look into why Opera does not show the red *square*.
>
> fixed.
>
> http://hugin.sour
On 26.07.2011, at 23:51, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On July 26, 2011 05:22:42 PM Carl von Einem wrote:
>> I didn't see this issue so far on both of my Macs: the oldish one is a
>> dual processor PowerPC (2x 2.3 GHz, 6.5 GB RAM), the newer one is a dual
>> "hexacore" Intel Mac with about 24 or 26 GB of R
On 26.07.2011, at 23:22, Carl von Einem wrote:
> Yuval Levy schrieb am 26.07.11 18:27:
On July 26, 2011 08:10:28 AM Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I think this is one of the most serious bugs hugin ever had.
>>>
>>> Mainly because of the number of users affected by this issue.
>>
>> Yes, it
Dear all.
On 28.07.2011, at 14:18, kfj wrote:
> On 28 Jul., 09:43, Jeffrey Martin <360cit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I can't help with that, but I'm wondering, as a thought experiment - how
>> much time are we talking about for this to be done? How many man-years? 1?
>> 5? 20?
>
> In my experience r
On 29 Jul., 11:25, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>
> You may want to take a look at rawtherapee 3.x. It can do a very good
> job at restoring the highligths. I was able to get this [1] while the
> in camera jpeg looks like this [2] using the method described at [3].
> It still has some ugly magenta tin
On 28 July 2011 13:53, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I suppose my 450D isn't too far from a 550D, but I'll nevertheless do
> a couple of test shots to see if I can also recover two stops from
> what it reckons is blown. What raw converter do you use?
You may want to take a look at rawtherapee 3.x.
On 24 Jul., 16:06, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi group!
>
> I'm working on a plugin to automatically group images in stacks.
> ...
anyone out there? Still haven't figured it out...
Kay
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hugin and other free panoram
On 29 Jul., 01:00, "Terry Duell" wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:31:08 +1000, kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > --fullscale --sieve2size 5 -o %o %s
> Adding the above options resulted in only 7 control points, versus 15 with
> the default options.
Oops! Must be very blurred indeed. Do you ha
On Thursday, July 28, 2011 1:53:11 PM UTC+2, kfj wrote:
>
> On 28 Jul., 09:39, Jeffrey Martin <360c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I suppose my 450D isn't too far from a 550D, but I'll nevertheless do
> a couple of test shots to see if I can also recover two stops from
> what it reckons is blown. Wh
On 29 Jul., 07:31, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On July 27, 2011 05:05:41 AM kfj wrote:
>
> > measuring the time-to-satuartion for the cells.
> > Wonder if anyone thought of that?
>
> http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=MkDJEBAJ&dq=measure+time+t...
>
> coming to a camera in your neighborhood phot
On 29 Jul., 05:42, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Kay will be either ROTFL or aiming a rocket launcher at ohloh's head quarters
> when he reads [5].
it must be the GPL in the head of each file, together with the files
containing less code than average per file ;-)
> [5]https://www.ohloh.net/p/hugin/factoi
On 28 Jul., 20:48, Yuval Levy wrote:
> On July 28, 2011 08:18:54 AM kfj wrote:
> > The looming five or twenty or 65 man years question musn't keep us
> > from asking:
> > ...
> Very good questions. And very good argument for a clean rewrite, with a
> clearly defined goal of recreating the exi
19 matches
Mail list logo
