Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin - Microscope images showing strong parallax when stitched

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:31 PM, hercat grandrive...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am a new user using version 2011.4.0 I have 12 images taken with a microscope, all overlapping with the same magnification. As the sample is on a mechanical stage, Yaw, pitch and Z (focal length of the microscope)

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin - Microscope images showing strong parallax when stitched

hercat The program automatically generates suitable control points when I tell it hercat to align. However, when I reach the fast panorama preview, the resulting hercat image shows strong parallax, and is much narrower on the right side, even hercat when I select Mosaic and Cylindrical

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2012.0beta1 released

Hi Harry It seems that I was a bit premature with my patch. The api-min/max strings from the python scripts are compared to HUGIN_API_VERSION and this is defined as ${V_MAJOR}.${V_MINOR}.${V_PATCH}. So in order to actually work, the api-max would have to be set to 2012.0.0. Obviously, the same

[hugin-ptx] Re: Translators requested for Hugin 2012.0 release

Hi all, there is a first bug report about typos in the strings which should be translated. https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1028387 Are there more typos? If you found one please report back. We will collect some typos and fix them in one rush to keep the annoyance for the translators as low

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2012.0beta1 released

Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote: [...] This tarball is equivalent to rev/changeset 774550436f28 in our Mercurial repository, where it is also tagged 2012.0beta1 Verify its SHA1SUM 8f9aa64b86f799283d302d702de4ecb16976f07a hugin-2012.0.0_beta1.tar.bz2 Uploaded to

[hugin-ptx] Garbage output despite many control points

Hello, I tried to stitch 30 photos to create a 360° equirectangular (and then stereographic) panorama following this tutorial: https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jftphotography/505008136/in/set-72157600232700728/ I import my images and generate control points with autopano-sift-c. The problem is

Re: [hugin-ptx] Garbage output despite many control points

I hardly use auto generated control points, but have heard that the new cpfind works much better than autopano-sift-c. It comes with newer versions of hugin. What version are you using? I would suggest that you create few well distributed control points in one horizontal line of images first, and

Re: [hugin-ptx] Garbage output despite many control points

I'm using 2011.4.0 on OS X, I'll try with cpfind and your suggestions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post

Re: [hugin-ptx] Homebrew panohead (novice approach)

Thomas Pryds píše v St 18. 07. 2012 v 19:43 +0200: Hi Sorry if this is off-topic (is it?) Recently, I spent some time doing a homebrew panohead. Being a total novice to this in particular and to building physical stuff in general, I thought I would share my experiences with you, so I did

Re: [hugin-ptx] Garbage output despite many control points

With cpfind it's about the same. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Garbage output despite many control points

If you don`t want to make control points manually (I usually do, as I said) you can also try to make them automatically in parts. Go to the Image tab, select only part of the images (like those correspondent to one only horizontal line or those that were disconnected) and with them selected press