Re: [hugin-ptx] Aerial images, image positioning model

On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 23:20:18 +1100, Andrés Llopis Lozano wrote: From here, http://hugin.sourceforge.net/docs/manual/Image_positioning_model.html I get that the image positioning model assumes that all pictures are taken from the same spot and taken by rotating

Re: [hugin-ptx] still pano from video

Ciao Battle. > Some time ago I saw on this forum, I think, a video of stills being extracted > from a video taken of a tower, and assembled into a still. Seems like it was > European tower of some kind. There was a hyperlink to an external site. I > was trying to find this thread in order to

[hugin-ptx] Aerial images, image positioning model

>From here, http://hugin.sourceforge.net/docs/manual/Image_positioning_model.html I get that the image positioning model assumes that all pictures are taken from the same spot and taken by rotating around a no-parallax axis. For the case of aerial imagery clearly this is not the case, I have

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Records office preparation

Battle wrote: My experience with this kind of thing is to maximize the distance to the object using a longer lens when possible which reduces the angles and amount of variation from image to image which in the end tends to overcome the variation of handheld image capture. For example, can