I tried processing my Minolta RAW files using Raw Therapee instead of
Bibble 5, just in case that made a difference.
While the exposure came out better, 2016 still produces a rotated
panorama, which Hugin 2015 doesn't.
--
David W. Jones
gnomeno...@gmail.com
wandering the landscape of god
http
On 03/06/2016 08:38 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 17:26:16 -1000, David W. Jones wrote:
On 03/06/2016 04:52 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 6 March 2016 at 16:15:12 -1000, David W. Jones wrote:
Anyway, ideas? Thanks.
Do I understand correctly that you
On 03/06/2016 09:55 PM, Stefan Peter wrote:
Dear David W. Jones,
Am 07.03.2016 um 03:15 schrieb David W. Jones:
Then, just for fun, when I clicked Stitch, PT Batcher Gui reported:
03:54:46 PM: can't open file
'/usr/share/hugin/xrc/data/ptbatcher_running.png' (error 2: No such file
or directory
as an experiment I made the focal length bigger (from 4.?? to 10 ) and got
MANY more control points!
On Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 2:50:17 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote:
>
> *W*hat I wish is to make a diagram of a house and then to make a
> photoshere of every room of this house. I'll then and put th
The spherical thing in panorama stitcher appears to be too small. If I add
all 26 of my pictures they encompass the sphere abut three layers deep. I
do believe there is a setting to make that sphere bigger . As well as
needing to know what setting I need to change I need to know how to figure
o
Thanks! That was what I needed to know.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Martin -
On Thursday, 10 March 2016 20:00:18 UTC+1, Martin Knowles wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation.
You're welcome.
> ...
> and it looks like the most efficient thing to do is to modify the
> alpha masks on the original input, rather than trying to do the final
> stack in Photoshop.
Thanks for the explanation. I took a look at the original paper, and chunks
of the enfuse source code (my, it's been a long time since graphics courses
as part of my CS degree...;-) and it looks like the most efficient thing to
do is to modify the alpha masks on the original input, rather than t
On Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:46:19 UTC+1, Martin Knowles wrote:
I've been experimenting with the save-masks option for dealing with
architectural subjects,
and what I'd like to do is load the images with their mask results as
layer masks into Photoshop
so that they can be tweaked eas
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 07:48:24AM -0500, Michael wrote:
> I was talking with my LUG group and they said the problem was that I hadn't
> taken my photographs from a tripod that rotates from the lens pupil.
> Meaning parallax would be bad in a field of view of about 6 feet. This
> problem results in
I spent a long time doing that resulting in no improvements.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola) <
cartol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Indeed, taking the indoor pics without rotating around the lens pupil will
> bring huge difficulties in stitching, probably making it
Indeed, taking the indoor pics without rotating around the lens pupil will
bring huge difficulties in stitching, probably making it possible only with
post edition.
You can try to use manual control points to improve it.
Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola)
http://cartola.org/360
http://www.panoforum.c
I was talking with my LUG group and they said the problem was that I hadn't
taken my photographs from a tripod that rotates from the lens pupil.
Meaning parallax would be bad in a field of view of about 6 feet. This
problem results in 'align' not being able to find more than about 20
control points
13 matches
Mail list logo
